Skip to content

N/A 8225101 (UDI 20199150023862)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · PROBE 8225101 5PK PRASS STD PROT HANDLE · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20199150023862), received between Jun 4, 2026 and Sep 23, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “False Negative Result” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 2 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • False Negative Result2
  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2026Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    It was reported that intra op, the EMG tube and probe was connected but only one side can be sensed so it had to be disconnected and procedure was delayed 1 hour and it was completed without the use of the device and the cuff and tube was checked prior to use ad it was function properly. There was no patient impact.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50864494 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 22, 2026False Negative Result

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTRA-OP, WHEN USING THE NIM STIMULATOR, THEY DIDN'T GET ANY RESPONSE ON THE MONITOR. THEY RECONNECTED EVERYTHING AND RETESTED IT AFTER CONCLUDING THAT THE PROBLEM WAS WITH THE NIM STIMULATOR. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A BACKUP PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25578682 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 4, 2026False Negative Result

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THYROIDECTOMY PROCEDURE; PROBE IS UNABLE TO STIMULATE AN EMG RESPONSE WHEN USED. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH REPLACEMENT PROBE USING THE SAME CAPITAL EQUIPMENT. REPLACEMENT PROBE IS ABLE TO STIMULATE AN EMG RESPONSE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25390160 ↗

Other STIMULATOR, NERVE devices

All STIMULATOR, NERVE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page