Skip to content

REFLEX 8735Recalls & reported problems

Conmed Corporation · Reflex TL, Skin Stapler with tissue lift, 35 wide · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20653405037016), received between Jun 3, 2024 and Jul 7, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Eject” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Eject2
  • Failure to Disconnect1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Failure to Eject; Failure to Eject

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE THAT 8735, REFLEX TL, SKIN STAPLER WITH TISSUE LIFT, 35 WIDE DEVICE WAS BEING USED DURING A CLOSURE OF A LACERATION PROCEDURE ON APPROXIMATELY (B)(6) 2025 WHEN IT WAS REPORTED ¿STAPLE GUN JAMMED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. JUST A SMALL DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. GUN WAS DISPOSED OF.¿. FURTHER ASSESSMENT QUESTIONING FOUND THAT ¿IT GOT STUCK IN HIS HEAD AND THE PROVIDER HAD TO PRY THE DEVICE OFF.". THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT OR USER. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22410604 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2024Failure to Disconnect; Failure to Disconnect

    THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THEIR CUSTOMER THAT THE DEVICE, 8735, REFLEX TL, SKIN STAPLER WITH TISSUE LIFT, 35 WIDE, WAS BEING PRE-OP TESTED FOR AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE WHEN IT WAS REPORTED, ¿IT DIDN¿T RELEASE SO I HAD TO PLACE ANOTHER STAPLE IN ORDER FOR IT TO RELEASE.¿. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20007514 ↗
  • InjuryJun 3, 2024Failure to Eject; Failure to Eject

    A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A CUSTOMER THAT THE 8735, REFLEX TL, SKIN STAPLER WITH TISSUE LIFT, 35 WIDE DEVICE WAS BEING USED DURING A SCALP LACERATION REPAIR ON (B)(6) 2024, AND ¿THE STAPLER DID NOT RELEASE ONCE IN THE PATIENT'S SCALP¿. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT, THE PHYSICIAN STATED: ¿I HAD TO REMOVE THE STAPLES THAT STUCK TO THE SCALP AND STAPLER BECAUSE THEY STAPLED TO HIGH ABOVE THE SCALP. I HAD TO TRIGGER THE STAPLER AGAIN TO RELEASE THE FIRST ONE AND THEN THE SECOND ONE DID THE SAME THING AND I HAD TO JIGGLE AND MOVE AROUND THE STAPLER TO RELEASE THE SECOND ONE. EVENTUALLY AFTER MANIPULATION AND MOVING AROUND THE STAPLER WHILE STILL IN THE SCALP IT RELEASED. OUT OF THE 4 THAT WAS DEPLOYED I HAD TO REMOVE 2 OF THEM BEFORE USING THE SMALLER STAPLER DEVICE¿. THE PHYSICIAN DESCRIBED AN OUTCOME OF INJURY DUE TO THE PATIENT HAVING "HAD MORE PAIN WITH MOVING AROUND THE STAPLER DEVICE STUCK TO THE SCALP. HE HAD SOME BLEEDING FROM THE MANIPULATION THAT WAS ABLE TO BE STOPPED WITH PRESSURE.". THERE WAS NO REPORTED DELAY AND NO REPORT OF MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT OR USER. THE PATIENT¿S CONDITION IS ¿STABLE¿. THIS REPO

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain

    MAUDE report 19447222 ↗

Other CLIP, REMOVABLE (SKIN) devices

All CLIP, REMOVABLE (SKIN) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page