Skip to content

Halyard 69455Recalls & reported problems

O&M Halyard, Inc. · HALYARD* Impervious Open Back Gown · Class 1

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 20680651694557), received between Feb 19, 2026 and Feb 19, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Incompatible” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Component Incompatible1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 19, 2026Component Incompatible

    ON (B)(6), A STAFF MEMBER EXPERIENCED STRIKETHROUGH ON THE FOREARM THAT RESULTED IN A CHEMICAL BURN. THE EMPLOYEE WASHED THE AFFECTED AREA WITH MILD SOAP AND WATER AND COMPLETED THE REMAINDER OF THE SHIFT. THE INCIDENT WAS REPORTED TO EMPLOYEE HEALTH; HOWEVER, TO THE MANAGER¿S KNOWLEDGE, THE EMPLOYEE WAS NOT PRESCRIBED ANY ADDITIONAL TREATMENT OR FURTHER EVALUATION. THE EMPLOYEE RETURNED TO WORK ON (B)(6) WITH NO MEDICAL TREATMENT REPORTED. AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT, THE EMPLOYEE WAS WEARING MEDLINE GLOVES. THE BURN OCCURRED ABOVE THE GLOVE LINE. IT IS CURRENTLY UNCLEAR WHETHER THE REACTION WAS CAUSED BY THE CHEMICAL IN USE, THE GOWN SLEEVE, OR THE GLOVES. THE EMPLOYEE IS KNOWN TO HAVE A GENERAL ALLERGY SENSITIVITY. THE CHEMICAL BEING USED AT THE TIME OF THE OCCURRENCE WAS ECOLAB MULTI-ENZYMATIC CONCENTRATED DETERGENT. THE MANAGER STATED THE FACILITY HAS USED THE SAME GOWN STYLE FOR MORE THAN EIGHT YEARS. STAFF MEMBERS CHANGE GOWNS THREE TIMES DURING AN EIGHT-HOUR SHIF; TWICE FOR 15-MINUTE BREAKS AND ONCE FOR A LUNCH BREAK. EMPLOYEES IN THIS AREA ARE ROUTINELY EXPOSED TO HEAVY FLUID LEVELS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24394019 ↗

Other ACCESSORY, SURGICAL APPAREL devices

All ACCESSORY, SURGICAL APPAREL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page