MEROCEL® 400402Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · DRESSING 400402 20PK STD NASAL 8CM LONG · Class U
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20681490105150), received between Oct 1, 2024 and Aug 11, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Swelling/ Edema2
- Nasal Obstruction1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that After the hemostatic sponge was packed, ventilation through both nasal cavities was poor, causing soreness and a feeling of distension in both upper eyelids. It was removed 48 hours after the operation. The sponge was removed and replaced in a timely manner, with no serious injury. The patient is in good condition and everything is normal.
Patient problems: Nasal Obstruction; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 50205054 ↗InjuryOct 1, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT MEROCEL PRODUCT WAS STERILE AND PACKAGING WAS NOT DAMAGED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT JAW CYST SURGERY AND MEROCEL SPONGE WAS USED BY PLACING INSIDE THE SURGICAL CAVITY ON THE JAW. THE SPONGE WAS PLACED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY FOR ABOUT 26 HOURS. USER INFORMED THE PATIENT THAT IT WAS USED TO STOP BLEEDING. THE SPONGE WAS REMOVED BY A DOCTOR. THREE WEEKS AFTER THE SURGERY, THE PATIENT FACE WAS SEVERELY SWOLLEN AND INFECTION WAS SUSPECTED.
Patient problems: Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 20343973 ↗
Other GAUZE/SPONGE, INTERNAL devices
- McKesson 61-59220Mckesson Medical-Surgical Inc. · Gauze/Sponge, Internal1 recall0 reports
- McKesson 61-59120Mckesson Medical-Surgical Inc. · Gauze/Sponge, Internal1 recall0 reports
- McKesson 61-59320Mckesson Medical-Surgical Inc. · Gauze/Sponge, Internal1 recall0 reports
- DeRoyal 30-054Deroyal Industries, Inc. · GAUZE/SPONGE, INTERNAL16 reports
- DeRoyal 30-057Deroyal Industries, Inc. · GAUZE/SPONGE, INTERNAL11 reports
- DeRoyal 30-060Deroyal Industries, Inc. · GAUZE/SPONGE, INTERNAL5 reports
- DeRoyal 30-068Deroyal Industries, Inc. · GAUZE/SPONGE, INTERNAL4 reports
- PILLING IPN004227Teleflex Incorporated · GAUZE/SPONGE, INTERNAL4 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.