Cordis PRECISE PRO Rx Nitinol Stent System PC1030RXCRecalls & reported problems
Cordis US Corp. · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Cordis PRECISE PRO Rx Nitinol Stent System (10)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032036549), received between Nov 21, 2017 and Jul 29, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Positioning” (2 reports).
4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P030047); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Partial Blockage1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Stroke/CVA1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 29, 2022Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Positioning
AS REPORTED, A 10MM X 30MM PRECISE PRO RX CAROTID SELF-EXPANDING STENT (SES) DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS BEING USED TO TREAT A CAROTID LESION BUT DID NOT DEPLOY NORMALLY. AS A RESULT, THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO SURGERY. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WILL BE RETURNED WITHOUT THE STENT ATTACHED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15128484 ↗MalfunctionJan 14, 2019Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
AS REPORTED, PRECISE PRO RX WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE REMOVED AFTER IMPLANTATION, HOWEVER THERE WAS RESISTANCE FELT. WHEN THE PRECISE PRO WAS REMOVED IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SHAFT OF THE COMPLAINT PRECISE PRO WAS SEPARATED. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES. THIS WAS A CAROTID ARTERY STENTING (CAS) CASE. A PRE DILATION WAS PERFORMED WITH A NON- CORDIS SHEATH, A NON-CORDIS FILTER WIRE (3.5-5.0MM) AND AN AVIATOR (4.5*30MM). A POST DILATION WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE PERFORMED WITH AN AVIATOR (5.0*30MM) BUT IT COULD NOT BECAUSE THERE WAS STRONG RESISTANCE FELT BETWEEN THE FILTER WIRE. SO, THE FILTER WIRE WAS REMOVED WITH A NON-CORDIS CATHETER BECAUSE A NON-CORDIS GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER COULD NOT BE INSERTED. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE DISTAL END OF THE COMPLAINT PRECISE PRO WAS REMOVED WITH THE FILTER WIRE. THE PHYSICIAN CONFIRMED THAT NO FRAGMENTS REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT BODY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AFTER HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED BY USING A NON-CORDIS HEMOSTASIS DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8244084 ↗InjuryApr 23, 2018Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Positioning
AS REPORTED, A PRECISE PRO RX US 10 X 30 STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) WAS DELIVERED TO THE TARGET LESION. DURING DEPLOYMENT, THERE WAS SOME RESISTANCE FELT AND THE STENT JUMPED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATED THAT THE PRECISE STENT WAS IMPLANTED DISTAL TO THE INTENDED TARGET LESION. ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION/AN ADDITIONAL STENT WAS IMPLANTED TO TREAT THE INTENDED TARGET LESION. THE TARGET LESION WAS THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (LICA). THE TARGET LESION WAS REPORTED TO BE: SLIGHTLY TORTUOUS, SEVERELY CALCIFIED, AND A SEVENTY-FIVE PERCENT (75%) STENOSIS. THE PRODUCT IS NOT BEING RETURNED FOR INSPECTION. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7451636 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2017Partial Blockage; Partial Blockage
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRECISE PRO RX STENT WOULD NOT LOAD ON THE WIRE AS THERE SEEMED TO BE SOMETHING INHIBITING THE DISTAL WIRE PORT OF THE STENT. THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AND NEVER ENTERED THE PATIENT IN A RUSH BECAUSE THE ANGIOGUARD FILTER WAS READY FOR USE. A NEW PRECISE STENT WAS LOADED ON THE WIRE WITH NO DIFFICULTY. AFTER THE PRECISE STENT WAS IMPLANTED, THE FILTER WAS EXTRACTED FROM THE PATIENT AND IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE FILTER BASKET SEEMED TORN ALONE ONE SIDE. THIS MOST LIKELY HAPPENED DURING THE RETRIEVAL OF THE FILTER. THE PHYSICIAN SAID THAT THE ANGIOGUARD FILTER DID NOT FEEL CAUGHT ON THE STENT. HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN EXAMINED UNDER XRAY DURING RETRIEVAL AND THE FILTER STOPPED WITHIN THE STENT. THEN ALL OF THE SUDDEN JERKED OUT QUICKLY. THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO TELL IF THE FILTER WAS CAUGHT, THEN CAME FREE OR IF HE JUST YANKED IT OUT QUICKLY. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE SLURRED SPEECH AND LEFT FACIAL DROOP DURING THE MIDDLE OF THE PROCEDURE. A NEUROLOGIST SPECIALIST WAS CALLED IN, A CLOT WAS LOCATED IN A SMALL BRANCH OF THE BRAIN. THE NEUROLOGIST SPECIALIST CONCLUDED THAT THE VESSEL WAS TOO SMALL TO RETRIEVE THE EMBOLI. THE NEUROLOGIST LATER FOLLOWED UP WITH THE PHY
Patient problems: Stroke/CVA
MAUDE report 7048754 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P030047. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1257-2021 · Feb 11, 2021 · CompletedPRECISE PRO RX CAROTID STENT implant system, Product Codes: PC0520RXC, PC0530RXC, PC0540RXC, PC0620RXC, PC0630RXC, PC0640RXC, PC0720RXC, PC0730RXC, PC0740RXC, PC0820RXC, PC0830RXC
- Z-0729-2020 · Nov 14, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedCordis Precise Nitinol Stent System. The Cordis PRECISE Nitinol Stent System devices are designed to deliver a flexible, self-expanding endoluminal stent to the carotid vascula
- Z-1946-2016 · May 4, 2016 · TerminatedCordis PRECISE (R) PRO RX Nitinol Stent System (Carotid)
- Z-1947-2016 · May 4, 2016 · TerminatedCordis PRECISE (R) RX Nitinol Stent System (Biliary)
Other STENT, CAROTID devices
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-0740-140-2Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls32 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-NV-6-40Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls9 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-NV-7-40Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls8 reports
- ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent SR-0940-CSSilk Road Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid1 recall5 deaths58 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-0640-140-2Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls7 reports
- ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent SR-1040-CSSilk Road Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid1 recall3 deaths56 reports
- CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System CND0840Inspire M.D Ltd · Stent, Carotid1 recall1 death41 reports
- CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System CND0940Inspire M.D Ltd · Stent, Carotid1 recall31 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page