ADROIT 67271700Recalls & reported problems
Cordis US Corp. · 6F .072 RBL4 100CM · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032071328), received between Aug 22, 2017 and Aug 22, 2017 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (3 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K131225); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Insert3
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 22, 2017Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND THERE WAS DIFFICULTY INSERTING THE ADROIT GUIDING CATHETER WITHIN THE RADIAL ARTERY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS A STANDARD ANGIOGRAM USING THE RBL 4.0 SHAPED CATHETER TO VIEW BOTH LEFT & RIGHT CORONARY ARTERIES. NO PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) PROCEDURE WAS REQUIRED FOR THIS PATIENT. FIVE CASES CONDUCTED SUCCESSFULLY WITH RESISTANCE EXPERIENCED IN THREE OF THE FIVE CASES. THE INSERTION DIFFICULTY WAS NOT CAUSED BY A BLOCKAGE OF POSSIBLY INJECTABLE MATERIAL. THE PRODUCT WAS PREPPED PROPERLY ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTION FOR USE (IFU) WITH NO DEFECTS OR DIFFICULTY NOTED. THE PRODUCT WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND APPEAR TO BE NORMAL. THE PRODUCT WAS PROPERLY FLUSHED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE. THE SHEATH DID NOT KINKED OR BENT DURING PREP OR DURING INSERTION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6811418 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2017Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND THERE WAS DIFFICULTY INSERTING THE ADROIT GUIDING CATHETER WITHIN THE RADIAL ARTERY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS A STANDARD ANGIOGRAM USING THE RBL 4.0 SHAPED CATHETER TO VIEW BOTH LEFT & RIGHT CORONARY ARTERIES. NO PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) PROCEDURE WAS REQUIRED FOR THIS PATIENT. FIVE CASES CONDUCTED SUCCESSFULLY WITH RESISTANCE EXPERIENCED IN THREE OF THE FIVE CASES. THE INSERTION DIFFICULTY WAS NOT CAUSED BY A BLOCKAGE OF POSSIBLY INJECTABLE MATERIAL. THE PRODUCT WAS PREPPED PROPERLY ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTION FOR USE (IFU) WITH NO DEFECTS OR DIFFICULTY NOTED. THE PRODUCT WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND APPEAR TO BE NORMAL. THE PRODUCT WAS PROPERLY FLUSHED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE. THE SHEATH DID NOT KINKED OR BENT DURING PREP OR DURING INSERTION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6811387 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2017Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND THERE WAS DIFFICULTY INSERTING THE ADROIT GUIDING CATHETER WITHIN THE RADIAL ARTERY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS A STANDARD ANGIOGRAM USING THE RBL 4.0 SHAPED CATHETER TO VIEW BOTH LEFT & RIGHT CORONARY ARTERIES. NO PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) PROCEDURE WAS REQUIRED FOR THIS PATIENT. FIVE CASES CONDUCTED SUCCESSFULLY WITH RESISTANCE EXPERIENCED IN THREE OF THE FIVE CASES. THE INSERTION DIFFICULTY WAS NOT CAUSED BY A BLOCKAGE OF POSSIBLY INJECTABLE MATERIAL. THE PRODUCT WAS PREPPED PROPERLY ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTION FOR USE (IFU) WITH NO DEFECTS OR DIFFICULTY NOTED. THE PRODUCT WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND APPEAR TO BE NORMAL. THE PRODUCT WAS PROPERLY FLUSHED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE. THE SHEATH DID NOT KINKED OR BENT DURING PREP OR DURING INSERTION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6811353 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K131225. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0003-2014 · Aug 12, 2013 · TerminatedCordis ADROIT 6F Guiding Catheter Product Usage: For intravascular introduction of interventional and/or diagnostic devices into the coronary or peripheral vascular system.
Other Catheter, percutaneous devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page