CARDINAL HEALTH 23250-407Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 30885380121702), received between Jun 5, 2025 and Jun 18, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Entrapment of Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryJun 18, 2025Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST-OPERATIVELY, A LAPAROTOMY SPONGE WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT FOLLOWING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE, NECESSITATING A SECOND SURGERY TO RETRIEVE THE SPONGE. THE RETAINED SPONGE RESULTED IN EXTENDED PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION BY 3-4 DAYS. AN X-RAY WAS TAKEN TO ASSIST IN LOCATING THE RETAINED SPONGE. PATIENT WAS INITIALLY TAKEN TO INTENSIVE CARE UNIT BUT HAD TO RETURN DUE TO COMPLICATIONS. THE SPONGE WAS FULLY RETRIEVED DURING THE SECOND SURGERY. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SPONGE COUNT WAS CORRECT, AND MACHINE READ A CORRECT COUNT AT THE END OF THE INITIAL PROCEDURE BUT DID NOT DETECT A SPONGE WAS IN THE PATIENT.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

  MAUDE report 22286608 ↗
• InjuryJun 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST-OPERATIVELY, A LAPAROTOMY SPONGE WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT FOLLOWING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE, NECESSITATING A SECOND SURGERY TO RETRIEVE THE SPONGE. THE RETAINED SPONGE RESULTED IN EXTENDED PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION BY 3-4 DAYS. AN X-RAY WAS TAKEN TO ASSIST IN LOCATING THE RETAINED SPONGE. PATIENT WAS INITIALLY TAKEN TO INTENSIVE CARE UNIT BUT HAD TO RETURN DUE TO COMPLICATIONS. THE SPONGE WAS FULLY RETRIEVED DURING THE SECOND SURGERY. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SPONGE COUNT WAS CORRECT, AND MACHINE READ A CORRECT COUNT AT THE END OF THE INITIAL PROCEDURE BUT DID NOT DETECT A SPONGE WAS IN THE PATIENT. EVENT DATE AND INITIAL REPORTER WERE UNKNOWN.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

  MAUDE report 22154585 ↗