SURFLASH SR*FF2025Recalls & reported problems
Terumo Corporation · SURFLASH I.V. catheter · Class 2
All models of SURFLASH (5)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 34987350743559), received between Jun 22, 2018 and Jun 22, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 22, 2018Break; Use of Device Problem; Break; Use of Device Problem
THE TECH WAS REMOVING THE CATHETER, AND WHEN THEY PULLED IT OUT THEY REALIZED IT WAS JUST THE HUB, SO THE DOCTOR WENT IN SURGICALLY AND RETRIEVED THE BROKEN PIECE (OF CATHETER). ANIMAL PATIENT CONDITION AND THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS GOOD. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 5/29/2018: THE DOCTOR WHO REITERATED THE CATHETER WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN UPON REMOVAL AT CONCLUSION OF CANINE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO LEAKAGE NOTED DURING PLACEMENT FROM APPROXIMATELY 10:00 AM -5:00 PM. THE TECH NOTED THE BROKEN CATHETER AND IMMEDIATELY HELD PRESSURE TO KEEP THE CATHETER FROM MIGRATING MORE THAN A FEW CM PROXIMAL IN CEPHALIC VEIN. THE DOCTOR OPENED UP THE VEIN, AND REMOVED THE CATHETER WITH NO CONSEQUENCE TO THE ANIMAL. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY AND WAS RETRIEVED 2 TO 3 CM PROXIMAL IN THE CEPHALIC VEIN. THE CANINE WAS RELEASED TO THE OWNERS CARE AND IS DUE TO RETURN FOR FIRST FOLLOW-UP.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7628772 ↗
Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days devices
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382523Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days660 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382533Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls527 reports
- BD PosiFlush 306546Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 death608 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard Shielded IV Catheter 381823Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, short-term less than 30 days582 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 381423Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 recall528 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382544Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 recall437 reports
- BD Nexiva, BD Q-Syte 383536Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls374 reports
- BD PosiFlush 306547Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls1 death331 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page