BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405707Recalls & reported problems
Becton, Dickinson And Company · TRAY SPN SPT24G3.5 B/L/E · Class 2
All models of BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 50382904057072), received between Mar 4, 2019 and Apr 30, 2020 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Recalls naming this device
- Apr 27, 2026Class IOpen, Classified
This is a sub-recall of a product recall from Huons Co, Ltd., the manufacturer of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride in Dextrose Injection, USP. The recall is due to quality issues identified during an FDA manufacturing facility inspection, citing specific quality deficiencies related to acceptance testing.
Z-2257-2026 · Root cause: Nonconforming Material/Component · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Component Missing1
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 30, 2020Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ANESTHESIA WAS INEFFECTIVE WITH A BD TRAY SPN SPT24G3.5 B/L/E. THIS OCCURRED ON 5 SEPARATE OCCASIONS DURING USE, HOWEVER, THE PATIENT INFORMATION IS UNKNOWN. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: IT WAS REPORTED THAT 5 TRAYS HAD INEFFECTIVE MEDICATION. ADDITIONALLY, ON 4/16/2020 THE BD SALES CONSULTANT PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: DID ALL 5 INCIDENTS OCCUR ON THE SAME DAY? YES. ARE YOU ABLE TO PROVIDE PATIENT IDENTIFIERS? APART FROM THEY ALL OCCURRED IN OUR LABOR AND DELIVERY FLOOR, I CAN NOT. WAS THERE SERIOUS INJURY? AS FAR AS I HAVE HEARD, NO. WERE THERE ERRONEOUS RESULTS? YES, THE MEDICATION BUPIVACAINE WAS INEFFECTIVE WHEN ADMINISTERED. DID THE COURSE OF TREATMENT CHANGE? YES, THE ANESTHESIOLOGISTS HAD TO SUPPLY BUPIVACAINE FROM OUR OWN PYXIS STATION. WAS THERE EXPOSURE TO BLOOD/BODILY FLUID? AS FAR AS I HAVE HEARD, NO. WERE THERE ANY OTHER ACTIONS TAKEN? WE NOTIFIED OUR SUPPLIER TO GET A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER CASE SENT (WE HAVE YET TO HEAR BACK) WILL SAMPLES BE RETURNING FOR INVESTIGATION? I ASSUME YOU MEAN A SAMPLE TRAY, IN WHICH CASE YES. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO GET THE 3 UNOPENED CASES (30 TRAYS) WE HAVE REPLACED
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10015601 ↗MalfunctionAug 5, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER REMOVING THE TRAY SPN SPT24G3.5 B/L/E FROM THE PATIENT AFTER THE SPINAL PROCEDURE, THE HUB DISLODGED AND THE SPROTTE SPINAL NEEDLE REMAINED PARTIALLY INSIDE THE PATIENT, LEAKING FLUID FROM THE BACK. THE NEEDLE WAS REMOVED WITH NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS. THIS COMPLAINT WAS CREATED TO CAPTURE THE 2ND OF 2 RELATED INCIDENTS. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: AS THE DOCTOR WAS REMOVING THE INTRODUCER FROM THE PATIENT AFTER HER SPINAL PROCEDURE, THE HUB CAME DISLODGED AND THE SPROTTE SPINAL NEEDLE PARTIALLY REMAINED IN THE PATIENT, DRIPPING FLUID FROM THE BACK. SHE WAS ABLE TO GRASP AND REMOVE THE NEEDLE, AND NO ADVERSE AFFECTS TO THE PATIENT WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE INCIDENT. THE ANESTHESIA TECH HAS ALSO REPORTED INSTANCES OF THESE NEEDLES BENDING.
Patient problems: Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage
MAUDE report 8861280 ↗MalfunctionAug 5, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRAY SPN SPT24G3.5 B/L/E EXPERIENCED A NEEDLE THAT BROKE/PULLED OUT OF THE HUB DURING USE. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: MATERIAL NO.: 405707 BATCH NO.: 0001260927. AS PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE INTRODUCER FROM THE PATIENT AFTER HER SPINAL PROCEDURE, THE HUB CAME DISLODGED AND THE SPINAL NEEDLE PARTIALLY REMAINED IN THE PATIENT, DRIPPING FLUID FROM THE BACK. SHE WAS ABLE TO GRASP AND REMOVE THE NEEDLE, AND NO ADVERSE AFFECTS TO THE PATIENT WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE INCIDENT. THE ANESTHESIA TECH HAS ALSO REPORTED INSTANCES OF THESE NEEDLES BENDING.
Patient problems: Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage
MAUDE report 8859649 ↗MalfunctionMar 4, 2019Component Missing
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRAY SPN SPT24G3.5 B/L/E CAUSED A PATIENT TO BE TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL WHEN "THE TRAY WAS MISSING BUPIVACAINE AND MARCAINE."
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8388227 ↗
Other Anesthesia conduction kit devices
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405671Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall68 reports
- ARROW IPN922678Teleflex Incorporated · Anesthesia conduction kit2 recalls0 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405672Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall27 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405673Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall10 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405637Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall7 reports
- BD Glaspak 405675Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405609Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405735Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page