Skip to content

GUARDIAN 65651-220Recalls & reported problems

Cardinal Health 200, LLC · 2000cc Guardian II · Class 2

All models of GUARDIAN (4)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 50630140152540), received between Mar 5, 2018 and Jan 5, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Suction Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Suction Problem2
  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Fracture1
  • Suction Failure1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Vomiting2
  • Exposure to Body Fluids1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 5, 2022Burst Container or Vessel; Suction Failure; Burst Container or Vessel; Suction Failure

    CUSTOMER REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS A PLANNED AIRWAY SUCTIONING. THE CANNISTER WITH SMALL AMOUNTS OF ORAL SECRETIONS SHATTERED IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS AFTER COMPLETING ROUTINE SUCTIONING OF THE PATIENT. THERE WAS A LOUD BANG HEARD WHEN THE CANISTER BROKE. THE SUCTION CANISTER WAS CONTAMINATED WITH ORAL SECRETIONS WHEN THE PRODUCT LOST ITS SUCTION CAPABILITY. THERE WAS NO INJURY OR ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT BUT THERE WAS BODILY FLUID EXPOSURE AS A PORTION OF THE CONTAINER DID CONTACT THE INTACT SKIN OF THE PRIMARY RN. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO RN. AT PRESENT RN IS DOING FINE.

    Patient problems: Exposure to Body Fluids

    MAUDE report 13172737 ↗
  • InjuryMar 5, 2018Suction Problem

    BASED ON INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER THE CANISTERS PLASTIC WAS FRACTURED AND DID NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUCTION FOR THE PATIENT. PATIENT HAD A NG TUBE TO LOW INTERMITTENT WALL SUCTION. REPORTEDLY DUE TO LACK OF POOR SUCTION THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED VOMITING, RETCHING AND PAIN. PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2018.

    Patient problems: Pain; Vomiting

    MAUDE report 7314780 ↗
  • InjuryMar 5, 2018Fracture; Suction Problem

    BASED ON INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER THE CANISTERS PLASTIC WAS FRACTURED AND DID NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUCTION FOR THE PATIENT. PATIENT HAD A NG TUBE SET TO LOW INTERMITTENT WALL SUCTION. REPORTEDLY DUE TO LACK OF POOR SUCTION THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED VOMITING, RETCHING AND PAIN. PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2018.

    Patient problems: Pain; Vomiting

    MAUDE report 7314771 ↗

Other APPARATUS, SUCTION, OPERATING-ROOM, WALL VACUUM POWERED devices

All APPARATUS, SUCTION, OPERATING-ROOM, WALL VACUUM POWERED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page