Skip to content

Implantium FX3412MLCRecalls & reported problems

Dentium USA · Endosseous dental implant · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Implantium (15)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI D755FX3412MLC0), received between Mar 2, 2018 and Oct 29, 2022 — classified as 10 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (8 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K041368); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate8
  • Osseointegration Problem6
  • Fracture2
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration9
  • Failure of Implant5
  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem2
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 29, 2022Fracture; Loss of Osseointegration; Fracture; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO IMPLANT FRACTURE, 3 YEARS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE III, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. LOCAL INFECTION, BONE RESORPTION AND PAIN WERE OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 15695167 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 23, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN ONE YEAR, APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE III, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. THE DOCTOR REPORTED NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 13587655 ↗
  • InjuryApr 7, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE 2, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. DURING THE SURGERY, LOCAL INFECTION, BONE RESORPTION, AND PERI-IMPLANTITIS WERE OBSERVED. PATIENT HAS RECOVERED SINCE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11632144 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2021Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO FAILURE OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, APPROXIMATELY FIVE MONTHS AFTER THE IMPLANT PLACEMENT DATE. ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT SITE WAS MODERATE. BONE QUALITY AT SURGICAL SITE WAS TYPE 2. DURING THE SURGERY, LOCAL INFECTION AND PERIODONTAL DISEASE WAS OBSERVED. PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Patient Problem/Medical Problem; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11106139 ↗
  • InjurySep 6, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE 4 MONTHS AFTER PLACEMENT SURGERY. BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE II AND ORAL HYGIENE AT THE SITE OF THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. DURING THE SURGERY, NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE OBSERVED. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 10498283 ↗
  • InjuryJan 15, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX3412MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 8 MONTHS AND 13 DAY AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF HYPERTENSION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED BONE RESORPTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 9593683 ↗
  • InjuryJun 5, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX3412MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AND 6 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE DOCTOR NOTED BONE RESORPTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8672109 ↗
  • InjuryOct 8, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX3412MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED BONE RESORPTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7945547 ↗
  • InjuryOct 2, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX3412MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 5 MONTHS AND 3 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7928436 ↗
  • InjuryMar 2, 2018Fracture; Fracture

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX3412MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO AN IMPLANT FRACTURE 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 7310024 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K041368. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1119-2007 · Jun 29, 2007 · Terminated
    Biomedicare Implantium Fixtures, Model numbers : FX3408, FX3410, FX3412, FX3414, FX3808, FX3810, FX3812, FX3814, FX4308, FX4310, FX4312, FX4314, FX4808, FX4810, FX4812, FX4814, FX4

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page