Skip to content

SuperLine FX4014SWCRecalls & reported problems

Dentium USA · Endosseous dental implant · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
20
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
20
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 20 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI D755FX4014SWC0), received between Jul 28, 2017 and Nov 6, 2024 — classified as 20 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (16 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate16
  • Osseointegration Problem15
  • Loss of Osseointegration3
  • Use of Device Problem2
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration20
  • Failure of Implant7
  • Unspecified Infection5
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem3
  • Pain2
  • Sinus Perforation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 20 most recent of 20 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 6, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN 1 YEAR, APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. THE BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE III. THE ORAL HYGIENE AROUND IMPLANT SITE WAS GOOD. NO SIGNIFICANT FINDING WAS FOUND DURING THE REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 20622860 ↗
  • InjuryJul 5, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO IMPLANT FRACTURE APPROXIMATELY 8 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE II, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. NO SIGNIFICANT FINDING WAS OBSERVED DURING REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THERE WAS NO TRAUMA HISTORY TO THE PATIENT RELATED TO IMPLANT FRACTURE. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 19684788 ↗
  • InjuryJun 30, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 8 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE IV, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS POOR. PERI-IMPLANTITIS WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 17243585 ↗
  • InjuryAug 15, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE, 2 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE III, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 15230402 ↗
  • InjuryOct 13, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE II, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE REPORTED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 12627848 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2021Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO FAILURE OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, APPROXIMATELY SEVEN MONTHS AFTER THE IMPLANT PLACEMENT DATE. ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT SITE WAS GOOD. BONE QUALITY AT SURGICAL SITE WAS TYPE 2. DURING THE SURGERY, PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN; HOWEVER, PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 11106128 ↗
  • InjuryNov 19, 2020Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO FAILURE OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, APPROXIMATELY 7 MONTHS AFTER THE IMPLANT PLACEMENT DATE. ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT SITE WAS MODERATE. BONE QUALITY AT SURGICAL SITE WAS TYPE 2. DURING THE SURGERY, NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE OBSERVED. PATIENT HAS RECOVERED SINCE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 10871171 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE 3 MONTHS AFTER PLACEMENT SURGERY. BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE III AND ORAL HYGIENE AT THE SITE OF THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. DURING THE SURGERY, NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE OBSERVED. THE PATIENT RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 10524110 ↗
  • InjuryJul 31, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2020 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION 4 MONTHS AND 19 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED PERIODONTAL DISEASE DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 10353137 ↗
  • InjuryJul 31, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2020 DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION 4 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED BONE RESORPTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 10353125 ↗
  • InjuryJan 31, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 1 MONTH AND 20 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8293441 ↗
  • InjuryDec 17, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    A DENTAL IMPLANT (NOT (B)(4) PRODUCT) WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE AROUND 6 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. AS IT IS NOT ONE OF DENTIUMUSA'S PRODUCTS, FURTHER INVESTIGATION WAS UNNECESSARY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8171693 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE RETURNED PRODUCT IS NOT A PRODUCT OF DENTIUM USA.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8107432 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 9 MONTHS AND 1 DAY AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY BUT IS A TOBACCO USER. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7661182 ↗
  • InjuryApr 20, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 1 MONTH AND 22 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED LOCAL INFECTION AND BONE RESORPTION DURING SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7447999 ↗
  • InjuryNov 6, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 4 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT PERIODONTAL DISEASE AND LOCAL INFECTION CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF TABACCO USE, BUT NO OTHER SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7004859 ↗
  • InjuryOct 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AND 2 WEEKS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT PERIODONTAL DISEASE MAY HAVE CASED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF HYPERTENSION AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 6936522 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 1 MONTH AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED LOCAL INFECTION CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6852593 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 5 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT LOCAL INFECTION MAY HAVE CAUSED IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6810240 ↗
  • InjuryJul 28, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4014SWC WAS REMOVED DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION 4 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED PATIENT HAD NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. PATIENT HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATION.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Sinus Perforation

    MAUDE report 6750643 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.