Skip to content

Implantium FX4308MLCRecalls & reported problems

Dentium USA · Endosseous dental implant · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Implantium (15)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
21
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
21
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 21 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI D755FX4308MLC0), received between Feb 27, 2017 and Feb 18, 2025 — classified as 21 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (17 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K041368); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate17
  • Osseointegration Problem13
  • Loss of Osseointegration4
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration21
  • Failure of Implant8
  • Unspecified Infection5
  • Pain3
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem2

Recent adverse event reports

The 21 most recent of 21 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE, 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE II, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. NO SIGNIFICANT FINDING WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 21406427 ↗
  • InjuryNov 29, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE III, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. PERI-IMPLANTITIS WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS NOT USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 18231046 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO INFECTION AROUND 2 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. THE BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE III. THE ORAL HYGIENE AROUND IMPLANT SITE WAS MODERATE. LOCAL INFECTION AND ENCAPSULATION WERE REPORTED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17777684 ↗
  • InjurySep 12, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN 1 YEAR, APPROXIMATELY 5 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. THE BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE I. THE ORAL HYGIENE AROUND IMPLANT SITE WAS GOOD. LOCAL INFECTION WAS OBSERVED DURING THE REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS NOT USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17731697 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE 7 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE III, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. \BONE RESORPTION WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 17438443 ↗
  • InjuryApr 21, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE, 2 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE I, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. NO SIGNIFICANT FINDING WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 16791975 ↗
  • InjuryMar 4, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO FAILURE OF OSSEOINTEGRATION APPROXIMATELY 6 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE IV, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. THE DOCTOR REPORTED NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER IMPLANT SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 13676469 ↗
  • InjurySep 15, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE APPROXIMATELY 5 AND A HALF MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE III, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY, BONE RESORPTION WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WILL REQUIRE ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 12477927 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 15, 2021Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE 3, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. DURING THE SURGERY, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT INTEGRATED. PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED, AND WILL LATER REQUIRE ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 11330542 ↗
  • InjurySep 6, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE 6 MONTHS AFTER PLACEMENT SURGERY. BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE III AND ORAL HYGIENE AT THE SITE OF THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. DURING THE SURGERY, BONE RESORPTION WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 10498279 ↗
  • InjuryJul 8, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4308MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) /2020 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 21 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE DOCTOR NOTED PAIN DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 10246632 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4308MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 8 MONTHS AND 13 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF HYPERTENSION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED BONE RESORPTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 9857580 ↗
  • InjuryJan 15, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4308MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AND 5 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED BONE RESORPTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 9593672 ↗
  • InjuryJan 15, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4308MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED BONE RESORPTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURIGCAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 9593645 ↗
  • InjuryAug 7, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4305MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 14 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE DOCTOR NOTED LOCAL INFECTION AND PAIN DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8871815 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4308MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 1 MONTH AND 10 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE DOCTOR NOTED LOCAL INFECTION DURING THE SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8310962 ↗
  • InjuryNov 5, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4308MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION AROUND 9 YEARS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT IS A TOBACCO USER AND HAS HISTORY OF BRUXISM AND HYPERTENSION. THE DOCTOR NOTED BONE RESORPTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8039032 ↗
  • InjuryJun 19, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4308MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED LOCAL INFECTION DURING THE SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7617521 ↗
  • InjuryJun 19, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4308MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 1 MONTH AND 5 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED SINUS PERFORATION DURING THE SURGERY. THE PATIENT IS A TOBACCO USER BUT HAS NO OTHER SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7617512 ↗
  • InjurySep 27, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4010SWC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO LOSS OF INTEGRATION FOUR YEARS AND TWO MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT BONE RESORPTION, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, AND PATIENT PAIN CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF DIABETES AND HYPERTENSION AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 6897552 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 27, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT, FX4308MLC IN TOOTH LOCATION #2 WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION 1 YEAR AND 8 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT THE BONE CONDITION CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT DIDN'T HAVE ANY MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 6363270 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K041368. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1119-2007 · Jun 29, 2007 · Terminated
    Biomedicare Implantium Fixtures, Model numbers : FX3408, FX3410, FX3412, FX3414, FX3808, FX3810, FX3812, FX3814, FX4308, FX4310, FX4312, FX4314, FX4808, FX4810, FX4812, FX4814, FX4

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page