Skip to content

Implantium FX4812MLCRecalls & reported problems

Dentium USA · Endosseous dental implant · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Implantium (15)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI D755FX4812MLC0), received between Feb 27, 2017 and Jun 3, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (6 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K041368); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate6
  • Osseointegration Problem6
  • Loss of Osseointegration3
  • Use of Device Problem2

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration9
  • Failure of Implant5
  • Pain2
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem2
  • Unspecified Infection2

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 3, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE, 1 MONTH AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE II, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. PERI-IMPLANTITIS WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 22135125 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN ONE YEAR, AROUND TWO MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE II, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE REPORTED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 14441328 ↗
  • InjuryMar 20, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE 2, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. DURING THE SURGERY, NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE OBSERVED. PT. HAS RECOVERED SINCE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 11536694 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2021Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE I, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. DURING THE SURGERY IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT INTEGRATED. PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE NEEDED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 11125025 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2021Use of Device Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Use of Device Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION APPROXIMATELY TWO AND A HALF YEARS SINCE THE IMPLANT PLACEMENT DATE. ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT SITE WAS GOOD. BONE QUALITY AT SURGICAL SITE WAS TYPE 2. DURING THE SURGERY, LOCAL INFECTION WAS OBSERVED. PATIENT WILL LATER REQUIRE ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 11106151 ↗
  • InjuryJul 8, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4812MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2020 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 9 MONTHS AND 12 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE DOCTOR NOTED PAIN DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 10246619 ↗
  • InjuryJan 15, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4812MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AND 7 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF HYPERTENSION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED LOCAL INFECTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9593711 ↗
  • InjuryJul 29, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4812MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION 1 YEAR AND 11 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE DOCTOR NOTED PERI-IMPLANTITIS DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE SURGERY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8838886 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 27, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT, FX4812MLC IN TOOTH LOCATION #30 WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2016 DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION 1 YEAR AND 6 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT THE INFECTION AND POOR ORAL HYGENIE CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT DIDN'T HAVE ANY MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT OUTCOME IS STABLE, BUT TREATMENT ONGOING.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6363310 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K041368. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1119-2007 · Jun 29, 2007 · Terminated
    Biomedicare Implantium Fixtures, Model numbers : FX3408, FX3410, FX3412, FX3414, FX3808, FX3810, FX3812, FX3814, FX4308, FX4310, FX4312, FX4314, FX4808, FX4810, FX4812, FX4814, FX4

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page