Implantium FX4812MLCRecalls & reported problems
Dentium USA · Endosseous dental implant · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Implantium (15)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI D755FX4812MLC0), received between Feb 27, 2017 and Jun 3, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (6 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K041368); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate6
- Osseointegration Problem6
- Loss of Osseointegration3
- Use of Device Problem2
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration9
- Failure of Implant5
- Pain2
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem2
- Unspecified Infection2
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 3, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE, 1 MONTH AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE II, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. PERI-IMPLANTITIS WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 22135125 ↗InjuryMay 19, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN ONE YEAR, AROUND TWO MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE II, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE REPORTED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 14441328 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE 2, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. DURING THE SURGERY, NO SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS WERE OBSERVED. PT. HAS RECOVERED SINCE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11536694 ↗InjuryJan 6, 2021Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE I, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. DURING THE SURGERY IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT INTEGRATED. PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE NEEDED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 11125025 ↗InjuryJan 3, 2021Use of Device Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Use of Device Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION APPROXIMATELY TWO AND A HALF YEARS SINCE THE IMPLANT PLACEMENT DATE. ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT SITE WAS GOOD. BONE QUALITY AT SURGICAL SITE WAS TYPE 2. DURING THE SURGERY, LOCAL INFECTION WAS OBSERVED. PATIENT WILL LATER REQUIRE ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 11106151 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4812MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2020 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 9 MONTHS AND 12 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE DOCTOR NOTED PAIN DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 10246619 ↗InjuryJan 15, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4812MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AND 7 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF HYPERTENSION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE DOCTOR NOTED LOCAL INFECTION DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9593711 ↗InjuryJul 29, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
THE DENTAL IMPLANT FX4812MLC WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION 1 YEAR AND 11 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY. THE DOCTOR NOTED PERI-IMPLANTITIS DURING EXPLANTATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE SURGERY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RECOVER.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 8838886 ↗InjuryFeb 27, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
THE DENTAL IMPLANT, FX4812MLC IN TOOTH LOCATION #30 WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2016 DUE TO LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION 1 YEAR AND 6 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT THE INFECTION AND POOR ORAL HYGENIE CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT DIDN'T HAVE ANY MEDICAL HISTORY. THE PATIENT OUTCOME IS STABLE, BUT TREATMENT ONGOING.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6363310 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K041368. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1119-2007 · Jun 29, 2007 · TerminatedBiomedicare Implantium Fixtures, Model numbers : FX3408, FX3410, FX3412, FX3414, FX3808, FX3810, FX3812, FX3814, FX4308, FX4310, FX4312, FX4314, FX4808, FX4810, FX4812, FX4814, FX4
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page