infinity OCTAGON 504812BLRecalls & reported problems
Hager & Meisinger Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung · Bone Level Implant Regular Connect Ø4.8x12 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of infinity OCTAGON (21)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 12
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI E0HM504812BL1), received between Mar 13, 2019 and Mar 15, 2024 — classified as 12 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (9 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate9
- Osseointegration Problem6
- Patient Device Interaction Problem2
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant8
- Inadequate Osseointegration4
- Pain1
- Swelling1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 15, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
InjuryNov 9, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT IS LOOSE AFTER ONE MONTH AND NO OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18103224 ↗InjurySep 21, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
InjuryJul 6, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT IS LOOSE & TOOK IT OUT. OSSEOINTEGRATION DIDN'T OCCUR.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17265877 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryMay 19, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryFeb 10, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
DOCTOR NEEDED A BIGGER IMPLANT WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11310966 ↗InjuryOct 24, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9232363 ↗InjuryMay 30, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
ASYMPTOMATIC AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS DIABETES MELLITUS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8653754 ↗InjuryMay 22, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS ALLERGIC TO PENICILLIN AND SHELLFISH.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 8634047 ↗InjuryMay 22, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
SWELLING, FISTULA, INFECTION AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Swelling; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8634044 ↗InjuryMar 13, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8417184 ↗
Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page