CONELOG® SCREW-LINE Implant, Promote® plus C1065.3811Recalls & reported problems
ALTATEC GmbH · CONELOG® SCREW-LINE Implant, Promote® plus, screw-mounted, d 3.8 mm, L 11 mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CONELOG SCREW-LINE Implant, Promote plus (44)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI E219C106538111), received between Mar 1, 2024 and Jun 5, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (9 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate9
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information10
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 5, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJun 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25382940 ↗InjuryApr 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryApr 1, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJan 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJan 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryDec 4, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryDec 4, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryApr 22, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryMar 1, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18816481 ↗
Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page