CONELOG® PROGRESSIVE-LINE Implant, Promote® plus C1086.3311Recalls & reported problems
ALTATEC GmbH · CONELOG® PROGRESSIVE-LINE Implant, Promote® plus, d 3.3 mm, L 11mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CONELOG PROGRESSIVE-LINE Implant, Promote plus (36)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Conelog Progressive-Line implant is a root-form implant. Reports mostly describe implants not joining to the bone and then being removed, with some removed for surgical reasons. There are 26 reports that mention injuries and no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 26
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 26
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 26 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI E219C108633111), received between Mar 18, 2024 and Jun 3, 2026 — classified as 26 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (18 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate18
- Use of Device Problem8
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information26
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 26 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryMay 12, 2026Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25155731 ↗InjuryApr 22, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryApr 22, 2026Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24953415 ↗InjuryApr 22, 2026Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24953408 ↗InjuryDec 19, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryDec 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryOct 22, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryOct 6, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJul 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJul 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJun 30, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22362467 ↗InjuryMay 5, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryApr 25, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryFeb 10, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21344626 ↗InjuryFeb 5, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJan 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJan 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryOct 11, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryOct 11, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20427065 ↗InjurySep 6, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryAug 14, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryAug 14, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryApr 23, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryMar 19, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18937402 ↗
Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page