CAMLOG® PROGRESSIVE-LINE Implant, Promote® plus K1075.3811Recalls & reported problems

ALTATEC GmbH · CAMLOG® PROGRESSIVE-LINE Implant, Promote® plus, screw-mounted, d 3.8 mm, L 11 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CAMLOG PROGRESSIVE-LINE Implant, Promote plus (24)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports: 19
Deaths reported: 0
Injuries reported: 19
Recalls naming it: 0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 19 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI E219K107538111), received between Aug 20, 2024 and Jun 3, 2026 — classified as 19 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (14 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

Use of Device Problem14
Failure to Osseointegrate9
Device Handling Problem1
Fracture1
Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings1

Patient problems

Insufficient Information19

Recent adverse event reports

The 19 most recent of 19 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

InjuryJun 3, 2026Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25375402 ↗
InjuryMay 15, 2026Fracture; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25185015 ↗
InjuryMay 15, 2026Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25184847 ↗
InjuryMay 5, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25084308 ↗
InjuryDec 23, 2025Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23876200 ↗
InjuryDec 23, 2025Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Use of Device Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23876143 ↗
InjuryMay 14, 2025Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings; Use of Device Problem; Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22017310 ↗
InjuryMay 2, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21952048 ↗
InjuryJan 10, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21130945 ↗
InjuryJan 10, 2025Use of Device Problem; Device Handling Problem; Use of Device Problem; Device Handling Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21129614 ↗
InjuryJan 9, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21120933 ↗
InjuryDec 9, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT FAILED TO OSSEOINTEGRATE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20878071 ↗
InjuryDec 2, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20818346 ↗
InjuryDec 2, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20818298 ↗
InjuryDec 2, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20817524 ↗
InjuryAug 22, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT FAILED TO OSSEOINTEGRATE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20028916 ↗
InjuryAug 21, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT FAILED TO OSSEOINTEGRATE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20014121 ↗
InjuryAug 20, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20008370 ↗
InjuryAug 20, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SURGICAL CONSIDERATION WITHIN 36 HOURS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20004870 ↗

Device details

UDI-DI	`E219K107538111`
Brand	CAMLOG® PROGRESSIVE-LINE Implant, Promote® plus
Model	K1075.3811
Company	ALTATEC GmbH
Product code	DZE · Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form
Class	Class 2
FDA submission	None listed
Implant	Yes
Rx / OTC	Prescription
Single use	Yes
Sterile	Yes
MRI safety	Labeling does not contain MRI Safety Information
Status	In Commercial Distribution
Record updated	Oct 22, 2020

Device type (GMDN): Screw endosteal dental implant, two-piece

A sterile device made of alloplastic materials [e.g., titanium (Ti), stainless steel, ceramic] intended to be surgically implanted into alveolar and/or basal bone of the mandible or maxilla to provide support and a means of retention for a dental prosthesis (e.g., bridge, single-tooth, overdenture). It is a two-piece device composed of an anchorage component (implant body) in the form of a threaded screw that is implanted into bone, and a retention component (implant abutment), typically attached to the anchorage component after implantation, that protrudes through gingival tissues to support the prosthesis.

Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices

Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BL
Institut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM
43,616 reports
STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BL
Institut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM
40,404 reports
Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BL
Institut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM
27,400 reports
STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BL
Institut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM
25,621 reports
STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BL
Institut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM
25,298 reports
Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BL
Institut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM
23,448 reports
STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BL
Institut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM
22,320 reports
STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BL
Institut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM
22,267 reports

All Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices →

Sources and updates

Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page