Skip to content

CIONIC NS-100Recalls & reported problems

Cionic, Inc. · Cionic Neural Sleeve NS-100 · Class 2

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI G345NS1000), received between Jun 24, 2024 and Jun 24, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Fall1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 24, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    THIS REPORT WAS MAILED ON 04/01/2024. THIS REPORT DETAILS THE INITIAL ONBOARDING SESSION FOR A CUSTOMER WHO PRESENTED WITH BILATERAL LOWER EXTREMITY WEAKNESS. THE INITIAL SETUP WAS FOR THE LEFT LEG PER STANDARD PROTOCOL TO ENABLE STIMULATION FOR ONE LEG AT A TIME. THE CUSTOMER SELF-SELECTED THE LEFT LEG FOR INITIAL SETUP AS SHE REPORTED THE LEFT LEG WAS WEAKER. THE MOBILITY SPECIALIST NOTED THAT THE CUSTOMER PRESENTED WITH LEFT HIP CIRCUMDUCTION, KNEE VALGUS, AND ANKLE INVERSION. THE PATIENT REPORTED A HISTORY OF FALLS WITH THE MOST RECENT ONE OCCURRING THE WEEK PRIOR. WHEN ASKED ABOUT PAIN, THE PATIENT REPORTED GENERALIZED PAIN THROUGHOUT HER BODY RATED AT 6-7/10 CONSISTENT WITH HER NORMAL, DAILY PAIN LEVELS. SHE DID NOT REPORT THAT PAIN IMPACTED HER WALKING. THE CUSTOMER WAS INITIALLY SITTING IN WHAT APPEARED TO BE A POWER WHEELCHAIR FOR THE SETUP OF STIMULATION. ALL FOUR MUSCLE GROUPS WERE ENABLED AT THE MOTOR OR SENSORY LEVEL PER THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERS: - SHIN STIMULATION TO ACHIEVE PROPER DORSIFLEXION WAS SET AT INTENSITY 50MA, 300 MICROSECONDS PULSE WIDTH, AND FREQUENCY 35HZ - CALF STIMULATION AT INTENSITY 35MA, 300 MICROSECONDS PULSE WIDTH, AND FREQUENCY 35HZ - QUAD STIMUL

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 19601258 ↗

Other Stimulator, Neuromuscular, External Functional devices

All Stimulator, Neuromuscular, External Functional devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.