NanoKnife 20400111Recalls & reported problems
Angiodynamics, Inc. · NanoKnife Disposable Single Electrode 5 Probe Pack - Activation · Class 2
All models of NanoKnife (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI H787204001110), received between Apr 18, 2024 and Oct 27, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (1 report).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K150089, K183385); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- Necrosis2
- Fistula1
- Internal Organ Perforation1
- Needle Stick/Puncture1
- Perforation1
- Urinary Tract Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 27, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
PATIENT INJURY: A TERRITORY MANAGER, IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE CASE, REPORTED AN END USER EXPERIENCED AN ISSUE WHEN USING 5-PROBE PROCEDURE PACK-ACTIVATION, 15CM. THE FIRST TWO PROBES WERE USED WITH NO REPORTED ISSUES. DURING THE THIRD PROBE PLACEMENT, THE PHYSICIAN PUNCTURED THE PATIENT'S BLADDER AND POPPED THE FOLEY CATHETER BALLOON. THE FOLEY WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED. WHEN THE FOURTH PROBE WAS PLACED, THE DOCTOR STUCK HIS FINGER CAUSING HIS FINGER TO BLEED. BEFORE THE TM WAS ABLE TO INTERVENE, THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED THE CONTAMINATED 4TH PROBE INTO THE PATIENT AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED HE DID CHANGE HIS GLOVES AFTER 3-5 MINUTES OF PUNCTURING HIS FINGER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE FOURTH PROBE.
Patient problems: Internal Organ Perforation; Perforation
MAUDE report 23391568 ↗InjuryOct 27, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PHYSICIAN INJURY: A TERRITORY MANAGER, IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE CASE, REPORTED AN END USER EXPERIENCED AN ISSUE WHEN USING 5-PROBE PROCEDURE PACK-ACTIVATION, 15CM. THE FIRST TWO PROBES WERE USED WITH NO REPORTED ISSUES. DURING THE THIRD PROBE PLACEMENT, THE PHYSICIAN PUNCTURED THE PATIENT'S BLADDER AND POPPED THE FOLEY CATHETER BALLOON. THE FOLEY WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED. WHEN THE FOURTH PROBE WAS PLACED, THE DOCTOR STUCK HIS FINGER CAUSING HIS FINGER TO BLEED. BEFORE THE TM WAS ABLE TO INTERVENE, THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED THE CONTAMINATED 4TH PROBE INTO THE PATIENT AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED HE DID CHANGE HIS GLOVES AFTER 3-5 MINUTES OF PUNCTURING HIS FINGER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE FOURTH PROBE.
Patient problems: Needle Stick/Puncture
MAUDE report 23391556 ↗InjuryApr 18, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN END USER REPORTED AN ADVERSE PATIENT IMPACT POST NANOKNIFE PROCEDURE THAT USED A 5-PROBE PROCEDURE PACK-ACTIVATION, 15CM. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A RECTOPROSTATIC FISTULA AND NECROTIC PROSTATE. NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED, AND NO REPORT OF PRODUCT MALFUNCTION PROVIDED. THIS MEDWATCH IS NOT TO REPORT A DEVICE MALFUNCTION, BUT TO REPORT AN ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT POST PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION DURING THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Fistula; Necrosis
MAUDE report 19133816 ↗InjuryApr 18, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN END USER REPORTED AN ADVERSE PATIENT IMPACT POST NANOKNIFE PROCEDURE THAT USED A 5-PROBE PROCEDURE PACK-ACTIVATION, 15CM. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED TOTAL NECROSIS OF THE PROSTATIC URETHRA WITH UTIS AND RETENTION, AND NEEDED TURP. NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED, AND NO REPORT OF PRODUCT MALFUNCTION PROVIDED. THIS MEDWATCH IS NOT TO REPORT A DEVICE MALFUNCTION, BUT TO REPORT AN ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT POST PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION DURING THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Necrosis; Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 19133815 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K150089, K183385. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1381-2023 · Mar 2, 2023 · Open, ClassifiedNanoKnife 5-Probe Procedure Pack 15 cm - Activation. Indicated for the surgical ablation of soft tissue. Catalog Number: 20400111 UPN: H787204001110
- Z-0073-2022 · Apr 24, 2020 · TerminatedAngioDynamics NanoKnife Disposable Single Electrode Probes, Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) Device, 15 cm IRE Single Electrode RFID Activation, PG. Catalog No. 20400103
Other Low energy direct current thermal ablation system devices
- NanoKnife H787204001110Angiodynamics, Inc. · Low energy direct current thermal ablation system1 recall0 reports
- NanoKnife 20400107Angiodynamics, Inc. · Low energy direct current thermal ablation system10 reports
- NanoKnife 20400103Angiodynamics, Inc. · Low energy direct current thermal ablation system8 reports
- NanoKnife 20300301USAngiodynamics, Inc. · Low energy direct current thermal ablation system1 death8 reports
- NanoKnife 20400104Angiodynamics, Inc. · Low energy direct current thermal ablation system6 reports
- NanoKnife 20300101Angiodynamics, Inc. · Low energy direct current thermal ablation system4 reports
- NanoKnife 20400109Angiodynamics, Inc. · Low energy direct current thermal ablation system3 reports
- Aliya Needle GTI-00023Galvanize Therapeutics, Inc. · Low Energy Direct Current Thermal Ablation System3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page