Smart Port CT CT66PTPDRecalls & reported problems
Angiodynamics, Inc. · Smart Port CT Peripheral/Chest Titanium Port System with Attachable 6.6F x 55cm Polyurethane Catheter and 7F Introducer Kit · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI H787CT66PTPD0), received between Jul 12, 2017 and Aug 23, 2022 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Material Puncture/Hole1
Patient problems
- Death1
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Information1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 23, 2022Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
AN END USER REPORTED AN ISSUE WITH A SMARTPORT CT PERIP. TITANIUM 6.6FR W/ POLY CATH. POST PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER DEVELOPED A HOLE. ULTIMATELY, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS, HARM, OR REQUIRE MEDICAL INTERVENTION AS A RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15278755 ↗DeathAug 22, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED BY HOSPITAL, "JULY 16TH OUTPATIENT PROCEDURE FOR A MEDIPORT PLACEMENT TO BE PERFORMED BY DR. (B)(6). THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA. THE MEDIPORT WAS PLACED, NO DIFFICULTY WAS COMPLETED ON FIRST ATTEMPT. PROCEDURE WAS APPROX 30 MINUTES, PATIENT WAS AWAKENED WITH NO ISSUES AND TAKEN TO RECOVERY. THIS IS WHERE HE BECAME RESTLESS, UNRESPONSIVE AND PULSE LESS. CPR WAS STARTED AND AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS THE PATIENT DID NOT RESPOND AND EXPIRED AT 9:47. THE CORONER ARRIVED AND AN AUTOPSY WILL BE DONE". FOLLOW UP PHONE CALL WITH RISK MANAGER INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT DEATH WAS BELIEVED TO BE DUE TO THE "DISEASE PROCESS," NOT TO PORT (DEVICE) MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Death
MAUDE report 7806408 ↗InjuryFeb 26, 2018Fracture; Fracture
AS REPORTED, PORT WHICH HAD BEEN IMPLANTED FOR APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO COMPLETION OF TREATMENT FOR CANCER. "UPON ATTEMPTED REMOVAL, THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE THE CATHETER AND NOTED SOME POTENTIAL DAMAGE AT THE SITE. PATIENT WAS REFERED TO INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. CATHETER WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED, BUT THERE WAS SOME DAMAGE TO THE CATHETER NEAR WHERE IT PASSED UNDER THE SUBCLAVIAN VEIN." THE USED DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AT THE HOSPITAL. THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS LISTED AS "STABLE."
Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 7295655 ↗MalfunctionFeb 15, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
ANGIODYNAMICS' LEGAL DEPARTMENT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION FROM A PATIENT'S ATTORNEY THAT A SMART PORT HAD MALFUNCTIONED. THE UPN AND HOSPITAL NAME WERE PROVIDED, BUT NOT THE NATURE OF THE MALFUNCTION. A LETTER WITH POTENTIALLY MORE DETAILS IS EXPECTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 7272607 ↗MalfunctionJul 12, 2017Fracture; Fracture
AS REPORTED TO ANGIODYNAMICS ON OCTOBER 05, 2016: THE PATIENT'S PORT WAS REMOVED FOR AN UNKNOWN ISSUE. UPON REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTED THE CATHETER HAD A TEAR IN IT APPROXIMATELY TWO INCHES FROM THE PORT. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER PORT. THE REPORTED DEFECTIVE DEVICE HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER AND AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE ROOT CAUSE FOR EVENT IS CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6705772 ↗
Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices
- PowerPort M.R.I., Groshong 9808560Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR3 deaths834 reports
- PowerPort ClearVUE 1608062Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR18 deaths571 reports
- PowerPort ClearVUE 5608062Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR31 deaths542 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1808000Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR19 deaths513 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1808060Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR1 recall15 deaths383 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., Groshong 1808560Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR10 deaths304 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1829500Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR6 deaths197 reports
- BardPort M.R.I. 0602680Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR2 deaths179 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page