Vortex P5305KRecalls & reported problems
Navilyst Medical, Inc. · Vortex VX Single Titanium Port System with Attached 7.2F x 53cm Silicone Catheter · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Vortex (14)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI H787P5305K0), received between Jul 12, 2017 and Mar 2, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K010189); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Crack1
- Fracture1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Bacterial Infection1
- Chest Pain1
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Neck Pain1
- Pain1
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 2, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2017, PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT PLACEMENT OF AN ANGIODYNAMICS VORTEX PORT CATHETER DEVICE, WITH MODEL NUMBER P5305K AND LOT NUMBER 5163667. THE DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED BY DR. (B)(6), M.D., (B)(6) FOR LACK OF VASCULAR ACCESS. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2018, PLAINTIFF PRESENTED TO (B)(6) HOSPITAL IN (B)(6), WITH COMPLAINTS OF CHEST AND NECK PAIN. BLOOD CULTURES WERE DRAWN FROM THE PORT SITE. PLAINTIFF WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCHARGED WITH A PRESCRIPTION FOR ANTIBIOTICS PENDING RESULTS OF THE BLOOD CULTURE. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2018, PLAINTIFF RETURNED TO (B)(6) HOSPITAL IN (B)(6), DUE TO CONTINUED DISCOMFORT AND THE POSITIVE BLOOD CULTURES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY DRAWN. SHE WAS DISCHARGED HOME ON ANTIBIOTICS. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2018, PLAINTIFF PRESENTED TO (B)(6) HOSPITAL IN (B)(6), DUE TO ISSUES WITH THE ANTIBIOTICS SHE HAD BEEN PRESCRIBED. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2018, PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT AN ULTRASOUND, WHICH DEMONSTRATED A THROMBOSIS IN HER LEFT INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN. PLAINTIFF'S MEDICAL TEAM DETERMINED THAT THE VORTEX NEEDED TO BE REMOVED DUE TO INFECTION AND THROMBOSIS. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2018, PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT REMOVAL OF THE DEFECTIVE DEVICE. THE REMOVAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED BY DR. (
Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Chest Pain; Neck Pain; Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24480053 ↗InjuryNov 13, 2018Fracture; Migration; Fracture; Migration
ANGIODYNAMICS' DISTRIBUTOR IN (B)(4) WAS ADVISED BY STAFF IN OPERATING THEATRES AT A HOSPITAL IN (B)(6) THAT A VASCULAR ACCESS PORT HAD BEEN EXPLANTED (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO 'END OF THERAPY' AND DURING REMOVAL THEY DISCOVERED THAT THE PORT'S CATHETER WAS 'FRACTURED'. THE LINE WAS DISCOVERED FRACTURED DURING REMOVAL. THE PATIENT'S MOTHER HAS FLUSHED THE PORT ONCE A WEEK SINCE THE INSERTION DATE ((B)(6) 2015). ABOUT A MONTH AGO BEFORE THE SURGERY DATE, THE PORT WASN'T FLUSHING WELL AND THE PATIENT FELT AS FUNNY FEELING WHEN THE MOTHER WOULD TRY TO FLUSH IT. THE MOTHER DIDN'T REPORT IT TO THE SURGEON BECAUSE PATIENT WAS ALREADY BOOKED FOR THE PORT TO BE REMOVED, THEREFORE NO XR WAS TAKEN AS SURGEON WAS NOT AWARE UNTIL THE DAY OF THE SURGERY. SURGEON MENTIONED THAT THE PORT LINE DIDN'T BLEED AT ALL WHEN REMOVED SO SHE BELIEVES THAT THE PORT WAS FRACTURED FOR SOME TIME. HOSPITAL ADVISED THAT PATIENT WAS STABLE/OK FOLLOWING REMOVAL OF PORT WITH FRACTURED CATHETER BUT DID ADVISE: 'AS A RESULT OF THE FRACTURED PORT, THE PATIENT NEEDED AN EXTRA INCISION ON THE NECK FOR SURGEON TO FIND THE BROKEN END OF THE LINE LEADING TO MORE PAIN AND SCARRING FOR THE PATIENT'. THE PORT WILL BE FORWARDED TO AN
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8063626 ↗InjuryJul 12, 2017Crack; Crack
AS REPORTED TO ANGIODYNAMICS ON JUNE 16, 2016: PATIENT HAD PORT PLACED IN THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN VEIN (B)(6) 2016. THE PORT WAS BEING REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2016. UPON REMOVAL, THE PORT BODY WAS RETRIEVED SUCCESSFULLY. HOWEVER A PORTION OF THE CATHETER FRACTURED OFF AND WAS NOT RETRIEVED FROM THE VASCULATURE. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE HOSPITAL VIA AMBULANCE AND REFERRED TO IR TO RETRIEVE CATHETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT WAS NOT SYMPTOMATIC IN RECOVERY PRIOR TO TRANSFER. THE RADIOLOGIST WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY REMOVE THE CATHETER FRAGMENT AND IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO PERMANENT HARM OR INJURY DUE TO THE EVENT. THE REPORTED DEFECTIVE DEVICE HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER AND AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE ROOT CAUSE FOR EVENT IS CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 6706011 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K010189. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0402-2011 · Sep 27, 2010 · TerminatedVortex VX Port, AngioDynamics, Inc., One Horizon Way, Manchester, GA 31816
- Z-0149-2008 · Oct 3, 2007 · TerminatedVortex VX, Port System, 9.6FR, REF/Part Number : P5455K, Catalog Number: P5455, Latex Free, Sterile, AngioDynamics Incorporated, Manchester, GA. 31816
Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices
- PowerPort M.R.I., Groshong 9808560Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR3 deaths834 reports
- PowerPort ClearVUE 1608062Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR18 deaths571 reports
- PowerPort ClearVUE 5608062Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR31 deaths542 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1808000Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR19 deaths513 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1808060Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR1 recall15 deaths383 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., Groshong 1808560Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR10 deaths304 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1829500Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR6 deaths197 reports
- BardPort M.R.I. 0602680Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR2 deaths179 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page