BioFlo 02-808Recalls & reported problems
Navilyst Medical, Inc. · 15.5Fx48cm BioFlo DuraMax with ENDEXO Technology Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Kit · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI H965103028080), received between May 31, 2016 and Mar 10, 2017 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture2
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 10, 2017Fracture; Fracture
EVENT OCCURRED IN (B)(6) - PATIENT HAD DIALYSIS CATHETER IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016. CATHETER WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO LEAKAGE AT THE EXTENSION TUBING OF THE CATHETER. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS OTHER THAN CHANGING OUT THE CATHETER. THE PATIENT HAD BEEN CONNECTING THEMSELVES FOR HOME DIALYSIS FIVE TIMES PER WEEK. THE DRESSING WAS CHANGED EVERY 2 DAYS AND THE SITE WAS CLEANED WITH 70% ALCOHOL. TEGO CONNECTORS WERE USED FOR CONNECTION. THOSE WERE CHANGED ONCE PER WEEK AFTER A 30 SECOND SCRUB AND 2 MIN. DRYING TIME USING CHLORHEXIDINE WITH 4% ALCOHOL SOLUTION. THE CATHETER FROM THE REPORTED EVENT WAS DISCARDED BY THE HOSPITAL.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6395976 ↗MalfunctionMay 31, 2016Fracture; Fracture
(B)(6) HOSPITAL HAS A PATIENT WITH A 48CM BIOFLO DURAMAX DIALYSIS CATHETER THAT DEVELOPED A LEAK AT THE JUNCTION POINT BETWEEN THE EXTENSION TUBES AND THE HUB. THE CATHETER WAS REPAIRED WITH A MEDCOMP REPAIR KIT, BUT WAS SLATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED. THE REMOVAL WAS DELAYED BECAUSE THE PATIENT IS ON ANTICOAGULANTS. IT WAS STATED THAT THE USED CATHETER WOULD BE RETURNED TO ANGIODYNAMICS FOR EVALUATION. THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS REPORTED AS "STABLE."
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5688305 ↗
Other Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted devices
- Palindrome 8888145014Mozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted1 recall312 reports
- Palindrome 8888145015Mozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death219 reports
- HemoStar Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter 5833690Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 deaths290 reports
- Palindrome 8888119369PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted3 recalls1 death14 reports
- HemoStar Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter 5833730Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted1 death141 reports
- GlidePath Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter with Preloaded Stylet 5393230Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted5 deaths138 reports
- Palindrome 8888119364PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death17 reports
- Palindrome 8888123404PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death17 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.