Xcela 44029Recalls & reported problems
Navilyst Medical, Inc. · Xcela Plus Plastic Port with Non-Filled Suture Holes and 6F x 63cm Polyurethane Catheter · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Xcela (39)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI H965440290), received between Nov 10, 2020 and Nov 10, 2020 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 10, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
A PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE REPORTING MEDICAL FACILITY FOR AN UNKNOWN REASON FOR PORT ACCESS. THE PORT HAD NOT BEEN ORIGINALLY PLACED AT THE REPORTING FACILITY. A DOCTOR REPORTED REMOVING A XCELA PLUS SUBCUTANEOUS PORT, SECONDARY TO NON-FUNCTION, WHERE THE SILICONE CENTER OF THE PORT APPEARED TO HAVE "POPPED-OUT" OF THE HARD PLASTIC HOUSING. THE DOCTOR SURGICALLY REMOVED THE PORT AND REPLACED WITH A BARD PORT & CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT HARM BUT THE DOCTOR DID EXPRESS AN INCONVENIENCE FOR THE PATIENT DUE TO THE "SECOND UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE." IT WAS INDICATED THE REPORTED DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR A DEVICE EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10818314 ↗
Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices
- PowerPort M.R.I., Groshong 9808560Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR3 deaths834 reports
- PowerPort ClearVUE 1608062Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR18 deaths571 reports
- PowerPort ClearVUE 5608062Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR31 deaths542 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1808000Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR19 deaths513 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1808060Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR1 recall15 deaths383 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., Groshong 1808560Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR10 deaths304 reports
- PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1829500Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR6 deaths197 reports
- BardPort M.R.I. 0602680Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR2 deaths179 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page