Skip to content

EM-19 Electric Motor 30185000Recalls & reported problems

W & H Dentalwerk Bürmoos GmbH · Electric Motor with cable 1.8m · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI J021301850001), received between Jun 27, 2023 and Jun 27, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Temperature Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Temperature Problem1

Patient problems

  • Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 27, 2023Temperature Problem; Temperature Problem

    PATIENT WAS HAVING REMOVAL OF HER WISDOM TEETH, WHICH REQUIRES REMOVAL OF BONE AND SECTIONING OF TEETH WITH A HIGH-SPEED ROTARY INSTRUMENT. WE USE A SURGICAL STRAIGHT HANDPIECE WITH A MOTOR THAT RUNS AT STANDARD 50,000 RPM (MFR: W&H ELCOMED). A 702 CARBIDE BUR WAS USED WITH COPIOUS NORMAL SALINE IRRIGATION. I ALWAYS USE MY FINGERS TO HOLD THE LIP / CHEEK OUT TO NOT ONLY GET MORE LIGHT INTO THE FIELD, BUT ALSO TO AVOID TRAUMA FROM THE BUR. A FEW MINS AFTER SECTIONING TOOTH #47, MY ASSISTANT NOTICED A DEEP (3RD DEGREE) BURN TO THE LEFT LIP COMMISSURE, EVIDENTLY AS A RESULT OF THE SHAFT OF THE HANDPIECE HAVING CONTACT WITH TISSUES WHILE IN USE. THIS IS EXPECTED. WE USE SURGICAL HANDPIECES EVERYDAY, BUT I HAVE NEVER ENCOUNTERED A BURN LIKE THIS BEFORE. I DID NOT FEEL ANY HEAT GENERATED BY THE HANDPIECE ITSELF, AND WE DIDN'T ACTUALLY EVEN SEE THE BURN UNTIL A MIN OR 2 LATER, ALMOST AS IF IT WAS A DELAYED REACTION TO WHATEVER HEAT OR VIBRATION WAS BEING GENERATED BY THE HANDPIECE. TO CLARITY IT WAS NOT THE BUR, BUT RATHER THE SHAFT OF THE HANDPIECE VS, MOTOR ITSELF. I COULDN'T TELL WHICH WAS RESPONSIBLE. THE BURN WAS FULL THICKNESS INTO MUSCLE. THOUGH THERE WAS NOT EVEN ANY BLEEDING FROM

    Patient problems: Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn

    MAUDE report 17212315 ↗

Other Controller, Foot, Handpiece And Cord devices

All Controller, Foot, Handpiece And Cord devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page