Skip to content

Dynasty DSPCGC50Recalls & reported problems

Microport Orthopedics Inc. · DYNASTY® PC SHELL 50MM GROUP C · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Dynasty (44)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI M684DSPCGC501), received between Oct 11, 2022 and Oct 11, 2022 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Metal Related Pathology1
  • Osteopenia/ Osteoporosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 11, 2022Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ALLEGEDLY, ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2014 PATIENT HAD A PROFEMUR TOTAL HIP SYSTEM IMPLANTED IN HER RIGHT HIP. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2019 PATIENT REPORTED FOR REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ELEVATED COBAL AND CHROMIUN LEVELS, PAIN AND EVIDENCE OF A PSEUDOTUMOR. PATIENT'S FIRST REVISION WAS NECESSARY BECAUSE THE DEVICE FAILED DUE TO CORROSION AT THE NECK-STEM JUNCTION. IT WAS DISCOVERED CORROSION OF THE PROFEMUR COCR MODULAR NECK WHERE IT SEATED IN THE POCKET OF THE MODULAR STEM. THE IMPLANTED NECK AND HEAD WERE REVISED. AFTER THE REVISION SURGERY PATIENT REPORTED AT LEAST 3 DISLOCATIONS. THE PREVIOUS EVENTS WERE CAPTURED UNDER MICROPORT ORTHOPEDICS GROUP NUMBER: 20060165. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED (B)(6) 2022: ALLEGEDLY, ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2021, PATIENT REPORTER FOR A REVISION SURGERY OF THE RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHOPLASTY, REVISION OF BOTH THE ACETABULAR AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS. SURGEON RECOMMENDED THIS SECOND REVISION SURGERY DUE TO RECURRENT INSTABILITY WITH DISLOCATIONS. DURING REVISION SURGERY, SURGEON DETERMINED THE ONLY WAY TO SAFELY REMOVE THE MODULAR STEM WAS TO PERFORM AN EXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY(ETO), WHICH REQUIRED FOUR DALL MILES CABLES WITH THE USE OF A 240 MM REVISION STEM. FI

    Patient problems: Metal Related Pathology; Osteopenia/ Osteoporosis

    MAUDE report 15584028 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Porous devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Porous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page