Skip to content

Implant Partners EAI3110LWDRecalls & reported problems

Microport Orthopedics Inc. · CS INSRT IMPL SZ 3 LEFT 10MM IMPLANT PARTNERS™ · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M684EAI3110LWD1), received between Mar 16, 2020 and Mar 16, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Use of Device Problem2

Patient problems

  • No Information2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 16, 2020Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH THE EVOLUTION NITRIX (TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS) BUT SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT A TIBIA INSERT BECAUSE THE HOSPITAL ONLY HAD IMPLANT PARTNER INSERTS AVAILABLE WHICH ARE NOT INDICATED FOR USE WITH THE EVOLUTION NITRIX. THE INSERT WAS LATER IMPLANTED WHICH WOULD WORK WITH THE TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS. THERE WAS A SECONDARY SURGERY DUE TO A NON-COMPATIBLE INSERT FOR THE ORIGINAL SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9835696 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2020Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH THE EVOLUTION NITRIX (TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS) BUT SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT A TIBIA INSERT BECAUSE THE HOSPITAL ONLY HAD IMPLANT PARTNER INSERTS AVAILABLE WHICH ARE NOT INDICATED FOR USE WITH THE EVOLUTION NITRIX. THE INSERT WAS LATER IMPLANTED WHICH WOULD WORK WITH THE TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS. THERE WAS A SECONDARY SURGERY DUE TO A NON-COMPATIBLE INSERT FOR THE ORIGINAL SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9835639 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page