Evolution EIS5S14LRecalls & reported problems
Microport Orthopedics Inc. · EVOLUTION® MP™ CS INSERT SIZE 5 STANDARD 14MM LEFT · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Evolution (125)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M684EIS5S14L1), received between Jul 13, 2020 and Mar 2, 2021 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unstable” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Unstable2
- Break1
- Naturally Worn1
Patient problems
- Joint Laxity1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 2, 2021Unstable; Unstable
ALLEGEDLY, PATIENT UNDERWENT LEFT TKR ON (B)(6) 2018. REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO LIGAMENT LAXITY AND INSTABILITY. REPLACED WITH THE EVOLUTION REVISION SYSTEM WITH STEMS AND AUGMENTS. ADDITIONAL HISTORY - PATELLA RESURFACED ON (B)(6) 2019 AND INSERT REPLACED FROM 10MM TO 14MM, REASON UNKNOWN. (B)(6).
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 11400151 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2021Break; Naturally Worn; Break; Naturally Worn
ALLEGEDLY, FIRST OPERATION AT (B)(6) IN 2017. VISITED (B)(6) ON SUSPICION OF INFECTION. IT WILL BE REMOVED FOR INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2020 AND (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE OPERATION ON (B)(6) 2021, HIS TIBIAL BASE WAS CLEARLY DAMAGED WHEN REMOVED. PHYSICIAN'S FINDINGS: SINCE THERE ARE NO FINDINGS OF METALLOSIS, IT IS UNLIKELY THAT THE IMPLANT HAD BEEN DAMAGED FIRST, BUT I AM WORRIED THAT THE IMPLANT MAY BE EASILY DAMAGED. REPORTER'S FINDINGS AND RESPONSE STATUS; IT SEEMS THAT THE SCAFFOLDING WAS LOST DUE TO THE INFLUENCE OF THE INFECTION AND IT WAS DAMAGED. HOWEVER, BECAUSE THERE ARE MANY RELATED FACILITIES, WE WOULD LIKE TO CONFIRM THAT THE IMPLANT MEETS OUR SAFETY STANDARDS. (B)(4). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 02/05/2021 FROM RELIABILITY ENGINEER: ADDING NEW PRODUCTS TO THE GROUP WITH ITS CORRESPONDING CODES.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11371804 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2020Unstable; Unstable
ALLEGEDLY, PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY. THE SIZE 5 14MM TIBIAL INSERT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A 24MM THICK INSERT. (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10268484 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page