Skip to content

Advance KTTINP20Recalls & reported problems

Microport Orthopedics Inc. · ADVANCE® II MODULAR TITANIUM TIBIAL BASE SZ 2 STD NONPOROUS · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ADVANCE (147)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M684KTTINP201), received between Jul 3, 2020 and Apr 12, 2023 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Information1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 12, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    ALLEGEDLY, PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING TIBIA. SRNJR NUMBER: (B)(4). SIDE:R. FRASA: P2 - MILD DISEASE NOT INCAPACITATING. PRODUCT NO REVISED: PRODUCT ID: KPONTP32, ADVANCE ONLAY ALL POLY PATELLA 32MM TRIPEG, LOT: 1735836, QTY: 1.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16726958 ↗
  • InjuryApr 5, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ALLEGEDLY, PHYSICIAN PERFORMED A REVISION OF A TIBIAL IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2022. A 12 MM BY 140 MM STEM WAS CONNECTED TO A SIZE 2 TRAY. THEY WERE IMPACTED TOGETHER WITH A SINGLE BLOW. THE PATIENT DID WELL INITIALLY BUT RETURNED WITH NOTING PAIN IN THE REGION OF THE TIBIA. HE RECALLED NO TRAUMA. X-RAYS SHOW THE STEM STARTING TO DISENGAGE FROM THE TRAY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 16686155 ↗
  • InjuryMay 13, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ALLEGEDLY, PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. REVISION NJR NUMBER: (B)(4). SIDE: L. PRIMARY ASA: P3 - INCAPACITATING SYSTEMIC DISEASE. MHRA REFERENCE NO: (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11820390 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ALLEGEDLY, SURGERY FAILED BECAUSE THE TIBIAL COMPONENT OF THE SYSTEM'S JOINT PROSTHESIS SEPARATED , NECESSITATING ITS REVISION, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 06/15/2020: ADDING PATIENT AGE AND DATE OF BIRTH. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 07/01/2020: UPDATE OF PRODUCT AND LOT IDS, DATE OF SURGERY AND ADDING INCIDENT DATE.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10229522 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page