Skip to content

PROFEMUR® PHA00612Recalls & reported problems

Microport Orthopedics Inc. · STEM REVISION "PROFEMUR® Z" SIZE 6 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PROFEMUR (116)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M684PHA006121), received between Apr 13, 2020 and Feb 6, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 6, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    CLINICAL STUDY # (B)(4). PATIENT # (B)(6) REPORTED THE FOLLOWING ADVERSE EVENT: HIP DISLOCATION. DISLOCATION WAS TREATED WITH CLOSE REDUCTION. THIS ADVERSE EVENT DID NOT END IN RE-REVISION SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS PROVIDED DUE TO PRIVACY POLICIES.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21323617 ↗
  • InjuryApr 13, 2020Use of Device Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Use of Device Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ALLEGEDLY, LEFT HIP ENDOPROSTHESIS DISLOCATION DUE TO EXTENSIVE INTERNAL ROTATION OF THE HIP JOINT, CLOSED REDUCTION AND IMMOBILISATION RESOLVED THE PROBLEM, NO FURTHER INSTABILITY OF THE ENROLLED HIP.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9953994 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page