Xpress Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw System T073-0700Recalls & reported problems
Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. · PEDICLE SCREWDRIVER ASSEMBLY · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M697T07307001), received between Mar 27, 2018 and Mar 27, 2019 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Fragmentation6
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 27, 2019Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE COMPLAINANT REQUESTED TO RETURN A SERIOUS OF BROKEN INSTRUMENTS FOR REPLACEMENT. THE COMPLAINANT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING THE INCIDENTS. THERE WERE NO KNOWN PATIENT COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MALFUNCTIONS. THE FOLLOWING MDRS ARE RELATED TO THE RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT. 3005031160-2019-00013, 3005031160-2019-00014, 3005031160-2019-00015, 3005031160-2019-00016, 3005031160-2019-00017, 3005031160-2019-00018.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8457355 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2019Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE COMPLAINANT REQUESTED TO RETURN A SERIOUS OF BROKEN INSTRUMENTS FOR REPLACEMENT. THE COMPLAINANT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING THE INCIDENTS. THERE WERE NO KNOWN PATIENT COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MALFUNCTIONS. THE FOLLOWING MDRS ARE RELATED TO THE RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT. 3005031160-2019-00013, 3005031160-2019-00014, 3005031160-2019-00015, 3005031160-2019-00016, 3005031160-2019-00017, 3005031160-2019-00018.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8457354 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2019Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE COMPLAINANT REQUESTED TO RETURN A SERIOUS OF BROKEN INSTRUMENTS FOR REPLACEMENT. THE COMPLAINANT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING THE INCIDENTS. THERE WERE NO KNOWN PATIENT COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MALFUNCTIONS. THE FOLLOWING MDRS ARE RELATED TO THE RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT. 3005031160-2019-00013, 3005031160-2019-00014, 3005031160-2019-00015, 3005031160-2019-00016, 3005031160-2019-00017, 3005031160-2019-00018.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8457352 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2019Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE COMPLAINANT REQUESTED TO RETURN A SERIOUS OF BROKEN INSTRUMENTS FOR REPLACEMENT. THE COMPLAINANT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING THE INCIDENTS. THERE WERE NO KNOWN PATIENT COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MALFUNCTIONS. THE FOLLOWING MDRS ARE RELATED TO THE RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT. 3005031160-2019-00013, 3005031160-2019-00014, 3005031160-2019-00015, 3005031160-2019-00016, 3005031160-2019-00017, 3005031160-2019-00018.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8457351 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2019Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE COMPLAINANT REQUESTED TO RETURN A SERIOUS OF BROKEN INSTRUMENTS FOR REPLACEMENT. THE COMPLAINANT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING THE INCIDENTS. THERE WERE NO KNOWN PATIENT COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MALFUNCTIONS. THE FOLLOWING MDRS ARE RELATED TO THE RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT. 3005031160-2019-00013, 3005031160-2019-00014, 3005031160-2019-00015, 3005031160-2019-00016, 3005031160-2019-00017, 3005031160-2019-00018.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8457350 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2018Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Fracture; Material Fragmentation
THE COMPLAINANT REQUESTED TO RETURN BROKEN SCREWDRIVER ASSEMBLIES TO THE COMPANY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED BY THE COMPANY. THE COMPLAINANT RESPONDED STATING THAT THE DAMAGE OCCURED WHEN THE SURGEON WAS LOCKING THE SCREW. THERE WAS NO HARM DONE TO THE PATIENT, AND THERE WERE NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7375305 ↗
Other Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation devices
- NA 04.614.508Synthes GmbH · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION277 reports
- CREO 1134.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION112 reports
- CREO 1119.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION80 reports
- VIPER 186731745Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION43 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 1553201090Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION38 reports
- EXPEDIUM 179902000Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION37 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7540220Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION36 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721640Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION35 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page