Powerflex™ Pectoral Implant Size 4, RightRecalls & reported problems
Implantech Associates, Inc. · Contoured Carving Block Implant · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M724ACPI4R1), received between Feb 8, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Seroma2
- Failure of Implant1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 24, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information
COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT AFTER EXPLANT AND IMMEDIATE REPLACEMENT OF PRIOR RIGHT SIDE PECTORAL IMPLANT (REFER TO MDR# 2028924-2017-00001), THAT THE PATIENT HAS HAD CONTINUING PROBLEMS WITH RECURRING SEROMAS ON THE RIGHT SIDE. APPROXIMATELY 6 WEEKS AFTER REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED, THE PECTORAL IMPLANTS WERE EXPLANTED BILATERALLY DUE TO THE RECURRING SEROMAS ON THE RIGHT SIDE. IMPLANTECH HAS ELECTED TO REPORT THIS EVENT ALTHOUGH THE PATIENT SYMPTOMOLOGY THAT LED TO THE REPORTABLE INTERVENTION WAS PRESENT IN THE PATIENT PRIOR TO THE DEVICE BEING IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Seroma
MAUDE report 6431805 ↗InjuryFeb 8, 2017Patient-Device Incompatibility
COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT PATIENT WHO HAD A PREVIOUS SET OF PECTORAL IMPLANTS, HAD THEM REPLACED WITH IMPLANTECH PECTORAL IMPLANTS. THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY DEVELOPED RECURRING SEROMAS ON THE RIGHT SIDE ONLY WHICH WERE INITIALLY REPORTED BY THE PATIENT APPROXIMATELY 14 WEEKS POST-OPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY ELECTED TO HAVE ONLY THE RIGHT SIDE IMPLANT EXPLANTED AND IMMEDIATELY REPLACED APPROXIMATELY 24 WEEKS POST-OPERATIVELY. IMPLANTECH FOLLOWED UP TO CHECK THE STATUS OF THE PATIENT 3 WEEKS AFTER REPLACEMENT SURGERY, AND THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS STILL HAVE PROBLEMS WITH SEROMAS ON THE RIGHT SIDE. THE PATIENT CURRENTLY PLANS TO HAVE IMPLANTS ON BOTH SIDES REMOVED WITHOUT IMMEDIATE REPLACEMENT. (IMPLANTECH HAS INITIATED A NEW COMPLAINT FILE TO INVESTIGATE THE NEW EVENT.)
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Seroma
MAUDE report 6311605 ↗
Other Implant, Muscle, Pectoralis devices
- Powerflex™ Pectoral Implant, Novack Style 2, SDM Size: 1, Right SideImplantech Associates, Inc. · Implant, Muscle, Pectoralis1 report
- AART Pectoralis Implant BAart · Implant, muscle, pectoralis1 report
- Pectoralis Implant ACP 2-2Hanson Medical, Inc. · Implant, Muscle, Pectoralis1 report
- Powerflex™ Pectoral Implant, Novack Style 2, SDM Size: 1, Left SideImplantech Associates, Inc. · Implant, Muscle, Pectoralis1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page