Palisade Pedicular Fixation System 10-10-60-4Recalls & reported problems
Spineology Inc. · Fixed Curved Rod · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI M7406704110), received between Oct 11, 2016 and Oct 11, 2016 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Device Slipped1
Patient problems
- No Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 11, 2016Device Slipped; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Slipped; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PRIOR TO THE INITIAL SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS POSITIONED ON A JACKSON TABLE. THE PATIENT RECEIVED A MULTI-LEVEL SPINAL CONSTRUCT WITH PLACEMENT OF INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICES ON (B)(6) 2016. DURING PLACEMENT OF THE RODS, THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO ADVANCE THE RODS FULLY BEYOND THE TULIP HEADS DUE TO INTERFERENCE FROM EITHER SOFT TISSUE OR BONE. MULTIPLE RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGES OF THE FINAL CONSTRUCT WERE TAKEN AT DIFFERENT ANGLES AND THE PHYSICIAN FELT COMFORTABLE WITH THE PURCHASE/INTERFACE OF THE RODS AND SET SCREWS. FOLLOWING THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT REPORTED HEARING A "POP" IN HIS BACK WHEN HE WAS ROLLING OVER IN BED. FOLLOW-UP RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING REVEALED THAT BOTH RODS HAD SLIPPED FROM THE TULIP HEADS AT THE CAUDAL END OF THE CONSTRUCT WHILE THE SET SCREWS REMAINED IN PLACE. THE PHYSICIAN INTENDS TO PERFORM A SECOND SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6017495 ↗
Other ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices
- NA 04.614.508Synthes GmbH · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION277 reports
- CREO 1134.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION112 reports
- CREO 1119.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION80 reports
- VIPER 186731745Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION43 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 1553201090Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION38 reports
- EXPEDIUM 179902000Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION37 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7540220Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION36 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721640Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION35 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page