Skip to content

FLASH MINI Ostial System OCB4508BARecalls & reported problems

Verge Medical, Inc. · FLASH MINI Ostial System, Dual Balloon Angioplasty Catheter, 4.5mm x 8mm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M917OCB4508BA0), received between Oct 19, 2017 and Mar 27, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method2
  • Use of Device Problem2
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Device Handling Problem1
  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • Air Embolism1
  • Death1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Vascular Dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    THE EVENT DESCRIPTION WAS PROVIDED TO OSTIAL VIA EMAIL BY THEIR SALES REPRESENTATIVE, ALONG WITH USER FACILITY REPORT MDR # (B)(4) FROM THE FDA. THE DESCRIPTION STATED THAT DURING A COMPLEX INTERVENTION, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO ADVANCE AN OSTIAL FLASH BALLOON INTO THE CORONARY ARTERY FOR ANGIOPLASTY. THE BALLOON WOULD NOT ADVANCE ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE GUIDE AND HAD TO BE REMOVED. THE FLASH DEVICE WAS PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM SERVICE, AND THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE USER FACILITY REPORT MDR # (B)(4) INDICATED A MALFUNCTION OF DEVICES. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR PRODUCT EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21710485 ↗
  • InjuryJan 14, 2023Material Rupture; Use of Device Problem; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Material Rupture; Use of Device Problem; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    THE EVENT DESCRIPTION WAS PROVIDED TO OSTIAL IN AN EMAIL RECEIVED FROM FDA FOR THE USER FACILITY REPORT MDR#: 1001760000-2022-8008. THE EVENT DESCRIPTION IN THE MDR INDICATED THE PROXIMAL BALLOON BURST DUE TO THE USE OF A STANDARD MANIFOLD SYRINGE FOR INJECTION (10 ML) INSTEAD OF THE SUPPLIED SYRINGE CALLED FOR IN THE IFU (1 ML) WHICH MAY HAVE INADVERTENTLY CAUSED THE BALLOON TO BURST. ADDITIONALLY, AN "AIR EMBOLISM" WAS OBSERVED BY THE PHYSICIAN TRAVELING DOWN THE CORONARY ARTERY. PER THE MDR REPORT, THIS DID NOT CAUSE ANY PERMANENT ADVERSE OUTCOMES AND REQUIRED ONLY INITIAL MONITORING TO PREVENT HARM.

    Patient problems: Air Embolism

    MAUDE report 16169484 ↗
  • DeathOct 19, 2017Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Device Handling Problem; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Device Handling Problem

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING THE REPORTED EVENT WAS OBTAINED FROM THE HOSPITAL AND LOCAL SALES REPRESENTATIVES: THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE ER AND THEN TAKEN TO THE CATH LAB FOR TREATMENT OF STEMI. THE PHYSICIAN DEPLOYED A 3.0MM DIAMETER STENT IN A CALCIFIED CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION OF THE RCA AND THEN REQUESTED A FLASH DEVICE FOR USE IN POST-DILATION OF THE STENT. THE CATH LAB DID NOT HAVE ANY 3.0MM DIAMETER FLASH DEVICES AT THE TIME, ONLY A 4.5MM DIAMETER FLASH DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE. THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO USE THE HIGHER DIAMETER 4.5MM DIAMETER FLASH DEVICE TO POST DILATE THE 3.0MM STENT. FOLLOWING INFLATION OF THE FLASH DEVICE, A DISSECTION OCCURRED AND THE VESSEL SHUT DOWN. CPR WAS IMMEDIATELY STARTED; HOWEVER, THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY EXPIRED.

    Patient problems: Death; Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 6962212 ↗

Other Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices

All Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page