3i T3 SHORT DCDRecalls & reported problems across all models
ZimVie US Corp LLC · 4 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 30
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 24
- Recalls
- 0
We found 4 models of 3i T3 SHORT DCD by ZimVie US Corp LLC in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 30 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Oct 1, 2019 and Jul 28, 2026 — classified as 24 injuries, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported 3i T3 SHORT DCD problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem22
- Separation Failure6
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size2
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection16
- Osteolysis13
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- Inflammation5
- No Information4
- Pain3
- Edema1
- No Code Available1
3i T3 SHORT DCD models
4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- 3i T3® SHORT DCD® BNES505IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM16 reports
- 3i T3® SHORT DCD® BNES506IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM8 reports
- 3i T3® SHORT DCD® BNES605IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM5 reports
- 3i T3® SHORT DCD® BNES606IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
Recent 3i T3 SHORT DCD adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 28, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that the dental implant at Tooth Site 16 failed due to peri-implantitis. Inflammation was also reported.
Patient problems: Inflammation; Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 50052227 ↗MalfunctionSep 15, 2025Separation Failure; Separation Failure
PER INDICATED: THE MOUNT WON'T COME OFF. THE IMPLANT MOUNT WAS TOO HARD AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THEREFORE, THE DOCTOR REMOVED IT AND REPLACED IT WITH A DIFFERENT PRODUCT. TOOTH SITE # 30.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23052084 ↗InjurySep 3, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANT LOCATED IN DENTAL POSITION NUMBER #26 FAILED DUE TO PERI-IMPLANTITIS. THE DOCTOR REPORTS IN THE PER THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS CONCLUDED BY PLACING ANOTHER IMPLANT. PAIN AND INFLAMMATION WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22952095 ↗InjuryJun 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT AT TOOTH SITE #12 WAS REMOVED DUE TO INFECTION AND BONE LOSS. DURING THE APPOINTMENT ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME BACK FOR FOLLOW UP. IN CLINICAL EXAMINATION, THE INFECTION AND INFLAMMATION WAS FOUND ON THE GINGIVA SURROUNDING THE IMPLANT CROWN OF #12 BY REVIEWING A PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPH. THE MOBILITY WAS II DEGREE. THE PROCEDURE OF EXTRACTION OF #12 IMPLANT WAS PERFORMED. ANOTHER PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPH WAS TAKEN TO REVIEW THE EXTRACTION SOCKET.
Patient problems: Inflammation; Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22333096 ↗InjuryMay 30, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANT LOCATED IN POSITION NUMBER #46 PERFORATED THE SINUS DURING IMPLANTATION AND WAS REMOVED TO AVOID SINUS PENETRATION. THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT CONCLUDED BY PLACING ANOTHER IMPLANT.
Patient problems: Sinus Perforation
MAUDE report 22114236 ↗MalfunctionFeb 11, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
NO ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION RECEIVED AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21356281 ↗MalfunctionFeb 11, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER PLACING THE IMPLANT, THE DOCTOR DISCOVERED THAT THE HEALING ABUTMENT WAS VERY HARD TO PLACE AND FLOATED WHEN PLACED. THE SAME THING HAPPENED WITH A SECOND HEALING ABUTMENT. IT IS VERY HARD AND DIFFICULT TO WORK WITH IN THE BACK TEETH AREA. THE IMPLANT IS NOT AVAILABLE AS IT HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPLANTED. THE DIAMETER OF THE HEX OF THE IMPLANT SEEMS TO BE LARGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21356091 ↗InjuryJan 9, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANT LOCATED IN DENTAL POSITION NUMBER #36 FAILED DUE TO PERI-IMPLANTITIS. THE DOCTOR REPORTS IN THE PER THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT CONCLUDED BY PLACING ANOTHER IMPLANT.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 21110458 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANTS LOCATED IN DENTAL POSITIONS NUMBER #14 & #16 FAILED DUE TO PERI-IMPLANTITIS. THE DOCTOR REPORTS IN THE PER THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT CONCLUDED BY PLACING ANOTHER IMPLANTS. PAIN AND EDEMA WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 21100195 ↗InjuryNov 18, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANT LOCATED IN DENTAL POSITION NUMBER #21 FAILED DUE TO PERI-IMPLANTITIS. THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT CONCLUDED BY PLACING ANOTHER IMPLANT. BONE TYPE: II. THE DOCTOR REPORTED PAIN AND ABSCESS.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 20703666 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANTS LOCATED IN DENTAL POSITIONS NUMBER 47 AND UNKNOWN FAILED DUE TO PERI-IMPLANTITIS. THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT CONCLUDED BY PLACING ANOTHER IMPLANTS. BONE TYPE: UNKNOWN. THE DOCTOR REPORTED INFLAMMATION.
Patient problems: Inflammation; Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 19643725 ↗InjuryOct 25, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18007597 ↗MalfunctionJul 19, 2023Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE DOCTOR REPORTS THAT THE MOUNT IS LOCKED INSIDE THE IMPLANT DESPITE COMPLETELY REMOVING THE SCREW. THE AFFECTED TOOTH POSITION IS #36. THE DOCTOR REPORTS IN THE PER THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS CONCLUDED BY PLACING ANOTHER IMPLANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17354873 ↗InjuryMay 4, 2023Separation Failure; Separation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CAN'T REMOVE MOUNT. AFTER THE MOUNT WAS IMPLANTED, IT DID NOT COME OFF. ACCORDING TO THE DOCTOR, IT IS NOT TIGHTENED WITH A PARTICULARLY STRONG TORQUE VALUE. NO HEALTH HAZARD. TOOTH SITE # 30.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16872436 ↗InjuryFeb 22, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 16416621 ↗
Other ZimVie US Corp LLC products
- Tapered Screw-Vent131 models · 13,236 reports · 4 recalls
- OSSEOTITE CERTAIN74 models · 1,891 reports · 1 recall
- TSX Implants28 models · 1,279 reports
- OSSEOTITE73 models · 894 reports
- 3i T3 DCD73 models · 789 reports
- OSSEOTITE CERTAIN PREVAIL15 models · 785 reports
- CERTAIN BELLATEK12 models · 9 reports · 10 recalls
- Eztetic15 models · 382 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page