Skip to content

CONCORDE LIFTRecalls & reported problems across all models

Medos International Sàrl · 13 models in the FDA device registry

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
68
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
44
Recalls
0

We found 13 models of CONCORDE LIFT by Medos International Sàrl in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 68 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jul 26, 2017 and Oct 19, 2020 — classified as 44 injuries, 24 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Collapse” (34 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works

Most reported CONCORDE LIFT problems

Device problems

  • Collapse34
  • Break19
  • Migration9
  • Mechanical Problem3
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device2
  • Detachment Of Device Component1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available32
  • Failure of Implant17
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient14
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient8
  • Pain5
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque2
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • Local Reaction1

CONCORDE LIFT models

13 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.

Recent CONCORDE LIFT adverse event reports

The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

Other Medos International Sàrl products

All Medos International Sàrl devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page