CRDRecalls & reported problems across all models
Cardinal Health 200, LLC · 4 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
2 open recalls name at least one CRD model. Check whether yours is affected in the recall details, and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls
- 2
We found 4 models of CRD by Cardinal Health 200, LLC in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 5 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Dec 22, 2017 and Mar 10, 2022 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Suction Failure” (3 reports).
2 FDA recall records name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 2 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
CRD recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Dec 21, 2023Open, Classified
The above-listed lots of Cardinal Health Medi-Vac CRD" Suction Canister Liners 1L may experience loss of suction on low or low intermittent suction settings, due to a misalignment of the liner with the outer hard canister.
Z-0756-2024 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Dec 21, 2023Open, Classified
The above-listed lots of Cardinal Health Medi-Vac CRD" Suction Canister Liners 1L may experience loss of suction on low or low intermittent suction settings, due to a misalignment of the liner with the outer hard canister.
Z-0754-2024 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported CRD problems
Device problems
- Suction Failure3
- Burst Container or Vessel1
- Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure1
Patient problems
- No Code Available2
- Hearing Loss1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
CRD models
4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- CRD 65651-510APPARATUS, SUCTION, OPERATING-ROOM, WALL VACUUM POWERED1 recall0 reports
- CRD 65651-517APPARATUS, SUCTION, OPERATING-ROOM, WALL VACUUM POWERED1 recall0 reports
- CRD 65651-515APPARATUS, SUCTION, OPERATING-ROOM, WALL VACUUM POWERED4 reports
- CRD 65651-530APPARATUS, SUCTION, OPERATING-ROOM, WALL VACUUM POWERED1 report
Recent CRD adverse event reports
The 5 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 10, 2022Suction Failure; Suction Failure
CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHEN THE SUCTION CANISTER WAS REPLACED DURING AN EMERGENCY C-SECTION, IT HAD NO SUCTION AND THE LINER WAS BEING CRUSHED WITHIN THE HARD SHELL AS IF THE VACUUM PRESSURE WAS SUCTIONING AROUND THE LINER INSTEAD OF WITHIN THE LINER. THERE WAS A 5-7 MINUTE DELAY TO CHANGE OUT TO A NEW CANISTER WITH NO ADVERSE EVENT OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13726469 ↗MalfunctionAug 21, 2020Suction Failure
BASED ON THE REPORT FROM THE CUSTOMER REPORTEDLY THE PPV FILTER IS PREVENTING SUCTION FROM PERFORMING PROPERLY. WHEN THE PPV FILTER WAS REMOVED FROM THE CANISTER LID, THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH SUCTION. THERE WAS NO LIQUID IN THE CANISTER AT THE TIME OF SUCTION ISSUE, SO IT WAS NOT A CASE WHERE LIQUID TOUCHED THE FILTER ENGAGING THE SUCTION TO CEASE. REPORTEDLY THE PATIENT HAD AN EXTERNAL FEMALE CATHETER IN PLACE, AND THE PATIENT HAD BEEN FOUND SOAKED IN URINE, AND THE SUCTION CANISTER WAS EMPTY. THERE WERE NO INJURIES NOTED AND NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL TREATMENT PROVIDED SINCE THE PATIENT ONLY NEEDS TO BE CLEANED UP.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10438685 ↗MalfunctionAug 21, 2020Suction Failure
BASED ON THE REPORT FROM THE CUSTOMER REPORTEDLY THE PPV FILTER IS PREVENTING SUCTION FROM PERFORMING PROPERLY. WHEN THE PPV FILTER WAS REMOVED FROM THE CANISTER LID, THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH SUCTION. THERE WAS NO LIQUID IN THE CANISTER AT THE TIME OF SUCTION ISSUE, SO IT WAS NOT A CASE WHERE LIQUID TOUCHED THE FILTER ENGAGING THE SUCTION TO CEASE. REPORTEDLY THE PATIENT HAD AN EXTERNAL FEMALE CATHETER IN PLACE, AND THE PATIENT HAD BEEN FOUND SOAKED IN URINE, AND THE SUCTION CANISTER WAS EMPTY. THERE WERE NO INJURIES NOTED AND NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL TREATMENT PROVIDED SINCE THE PATIENT ONLY NEEDS TO BE CLEANED UP.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10438482 ↗MalfunctionAug 21, 2020Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
BASED ON THE REPORT FROM THE CUSTOMER REPORTEDLY THE PPV FILTER IS PREVENTING SUCTION FROM PERFORMING PROPERLY. WHEN THE PPV FILTER WAS REMOVED FROM THE CANISTER LID, THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH SUCTION. THERE WAS NO LIQUID IN THE CANISTER AT THE TIME OF SUCTION ISSUE, SO IT WAS NOT A CASE WHERE LIQUID TOUCHED THE FILTER ENGAGING THE SUCTION TO CEASE. THE ISSUE WAS DISCOVERED WHEN PATIENT WAS FOUND REPORTEDLY COVERED IN GASTRIC CONTENTS, AND SUCTION CANISTER WAS EMPTY. PER THE CUSTOMER, THERE WAS NO INJURY, THE PATIENT IS STABLE, THEY DID NOT NEED ANY MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, JUST TO BE CLEANED UP.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10438374 ↗MalfunctionDec 22, 2017Burst Container or Vessel
CUSTOMER HAS REPORTED THAT THE LID OF THE LINER BLEW UP (IMPLODED). SHE STATED THE RED LID WENT INTO A MILLION LITTLE PIECES AND CONTAMINATED STERILE FIELD. CUSTOMER ALSO STATED THAT THE DR. HAS HEARING LOSS, NOT POSITIVE IF DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS SPECIFIC INCIDENT AS SHE HAS NOT HAD TIME TO INVESTIGATE. PIECES OF LID ARE AVAILABLE, BUT HOSPITAL WILL NOT RELEASED AT THIS TIME UNTIL THEY COMPLETE THEIR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: Hearing Loss
MAUDE report 7142170 ↗
Other Cardinal Health 200, LLC products
- JACKSON-PRATT20 models · 13 reports · 19 recalls
- Monoject35 models · 96 reports · 11 recalls
- CONVERTORS38 models · 40 reports · 11 recalls
- Argyle33 models · 58 reports · 7 recalls
- Salem Sump31 models · 40 reports · 7 recalls
- Dover45 models · 241 reports · 2 recalls
- Kendall31 models · 51 reports · 3 recalls
- Kangaroo35 models · 130 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page