Dignity Mid-Sized CT PortRecalls & reported problems across all models
Medical Components, Inc. · 4 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls
- 1
We found 4 models of Dignity Mid-Sized CT Port by Medical Components, Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 4 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jun 13, 2017 and Feb 4, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Aspiration Issue” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name at least one of these models by its device identifier.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Dignity Mid-Sized CT Port recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Feb 23, 2017Terminated
The 9.6F port kits were packaged with the incorrect valved peelable introducer. The label states the kit contains a 10F valved peelable introducer. The kit is packaged with a 9F valved peelable introducer. The port lumen will not fit through the introducer during the insertion procedure.
Z-1536-2017 · Root cause: Unknown/Undetermined by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported Dignity Mid-Sized CT Port problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Aspiration Issue1
- Connection Problem1
- Disconnection1
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- Chest Pain1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Information1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Thrombosis1
Dignity Mid-Sized CT Port models
4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Dignity® Mid-Sized CT Port MRCTI96801PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR1 recall0 reports
- Dignity® Mid-Sized CT Port MRDP80AMNPORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR2 reports
- Dignity® Mid-Sized CT Port MICTI80001PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR1 report
- Dignity® Mid-Sized CT Port MRDP96AMNPORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR1 report
Recent Dignity Mid-Sized CT Port adverse event reports
The 4 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 4, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
RECEIVED A CLAIM FROM A RADIOTHERAPY SERVICE. THE PHYSICIANS OBSERVED THAT THE DEVICE IS NOT ALLOWING THE THERAPY SESSIONS TO BE DONE CORRECTLY TO PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER, SINCE THE PORT ATTENUATE THE TREATMENT IN THE AREA, BECAUSE OF THE TUNGSTEN OR TITANIUM, AND THOSE ARE LEAVING UNTREATED AREAS.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 9666973 ↗InjuryDec 19, 2018Disconnection; Disconnection
REMOVING PORT-PORT SEPARATED FROM CATHETER. WAS ABLE TO GRAB THE CATHETER WITH HEMOSTAT AND REMOVE. THE CUFF/COLLAR WAS ADHERED INTO THE TRACT. IT SEPARATED FROM THE PORT AND THE CATHETER. PATIENT HAS TO RETURN TO HAVE A SURGEON DISSECT THE COLLAR FROM THE TRACT 2 WEEKS LATER.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 8178651 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2018Connection Problem; Connection Problem
PATIENT PRESENTED TO ED FOR RIGHT-SIDED CHEST PAIN OVER CHEST PORT SITE, WITH INABILITY TO DRAW BLOOD FOR THE PAST 2 WEEKS. X-RAY SHOWED DISLODGEMENT OF THE RIGHT CHEST PORT CATHETER. CATHETER LODGED IN THE RIGHT VENTRICLE. CARDIAC W/U NEGATIVE. PORT HAD BEEN PLACED IN 2017.
Patient problems: Chest Pain; Thrombosis
MAUDE report 7515666 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2017Leak/Splash; Aspiration Issue
PORT WAS PLACED IN PATIENT. ATTEMPTS TO ASPIRATE PORT BEFORE SUTURING FAILED. PORT WAS INJECTED WITH CONTRAST WHICH SHOWED LEAKING FROM THE DEVICE. BODY OF THE PORT WAS THEN REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6638160 ↗
Other Medical Components, Inc. products
All Medical Components, Inc. devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page