JMS WINGEATER A.V.FISTULA NEEDLE SETRecalls & reported problems across all models
Jms Singapore Pte Ltd · 3 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 32
- Deaths reported
- 8
- Injuries reported
- 24
- Recalls
- 0
We found 3 models of JMS WINGEATER A.V.FISTULA NEEDLE SET by Jms Singapore Pte Ltd in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 32 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Apr 4, 2017 and Sep 19, 2024 — classified as 8 deaths, 24 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported JMS WINGEATER A.V.FISTULA NEEDLE SET problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem20
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated10
- Expulsion4
- Leak/Splash2
- Unintended Movement2
- Use of Device Problem2
- Device Slipped1
- Disconnection1
Patient problems
- Hemolysis14
- Blood Loss11
- Hypovolemia7
- Death4
- Exsanguination4
- Cardiopulmonary Arrest3
- Loss of consciousness3
- Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension3
JMS WINGEATER A.V.FISTULA NEEDLE SET models
3 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- JMS WINGEATER A.V.FISTULA NEEDLE SET 820-5002-33Needle, Fistula6 deaths27 reports
- JMS WINGEATER A.V.FISTULA NEEDLE SET 820-7005-33Needle, Fistula2 deaths4 reports
- JMS WINGEATER A.V.FISTULA NEEDLE SET 820-5003-33Needle, Fistula1 report
Recent JMS WINGEATER A.V.FISTULA NEEDLE SET adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 19, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE DONOR DONATED ON (B)(6) 2024, WITH NO COMPLICATIONS NOTED WHILE HE WAS IN THE PLASMA CENTER. ON (B)(6) 2024, THE DONOR EXPERIENCED ARM DISCOMFORT AROUND THE VENIPUNCTURE (VP) SITE, INITIALLY ATTRIBUTING IT TO A WORKOUT. DESPITE THE DONOR'S USE OF ICE AND HEAT, THE DISCOMFORT DID NOT RESOLVE. THE DONOR VISITED THE ER ON (B)(6) 2024, WHERE HE REPORTED THAT AN X-RAY OF THE LEFT FOREARM REVEALED THAT PART OF THE NEEDLE WAS BENEATH THE VP SITE. THE MSS (PHYSICIAN SUBSTITUTE) ADVISED THE DONOR TO PROVIDE MEDICAL RECORDS AND A BIOLIFE MSS WOULD FOLLOW UP. CURRENTLY, THE DONOR HAS NOT PROVIDED ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR MEDICAL RECORDS. IMPORTER IS IN COMMUNICATION WITH FACILITY AND TRYING TO GET THE NEEDLE BACK TO MANUFACTURER AFTER IT IS EXTRACTED FROM PATIENT TO ENSURE THIS IS JMS NEEDLE. AT THIS POINT THERE HAS BEEN NO UPDATE FROM PATIENT.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 20263857 ↗InjurySep 19, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 11 TO 9. 5. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HOWEVER, THEY WERE NOT ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS 180 DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2. 0 POTASSIUM/2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF THE FRESENIUS PRODUCTS USED, AS WELL AS NO MACHINE ALARMS, CLOTTING EVENTS AND/OR DIALYZER LEAKS IN RELATION TO THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NOTHING UNUSUAL IN ANY OF THE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THERE WERE NO VISIBLE SIGNS OF
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9085658 ↗InjurySep 19, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 9. 0 TO 6. 7. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION ON (B)(6) 2019; HOWEVER, THEY WERE NOT ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS 160 DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2. 0 POTASSIUM /2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF THE FRESENIUS PRODUCTS USED, AS WELL AS NO MACHINE ALARMS, CLOTTING EVENTS AND/OR DIALYZER LEAKS IN RELATION TO THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NOTHING UNUSUAL IN ANY OF THE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THERE WERE N
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9085650 ↗InjurySep 19, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 12 TO 9. 6. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2019 WITH A HEMOGLOBIN OF 7. 7 AND REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2. 0 POTASSIUM/2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF THE FRESENIUS PRODUCTS USED, AS WELL AS NO MACHINE ALARMS, CLOTTING EVEN
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9085649 ↗InjurySep 19, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON 06/19/2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 8. 9 TO 7. 2. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL DUE TO WEAKNESS ON (B)(6) 2019 WITH A HEMOGLOBIN OF 5. 9 AND POSITIVE SCHISTOCYTES. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2019. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS 160 AND 180 DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2. 0 POTASSIUM/2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9085645 ↗InjurySep 19, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019 AND (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 12.5 TO 11. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL DUE TO WEAKNESS ON (B)(6) 2019 WITH A HEMOGLOBIN OF 8. 6 AND REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2019. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551). 0 POTASSIUM/2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9085644 ↗InjurySep 19, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON 06/19/2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 8. 7 TO 8. 4. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2019 WITH COMPLAINTS OF WEAKNESS AND REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. THE PATIENT ALSO HAS A HISTORY OF UNSPECIFIED BLOOD DISORDER AND PREVIOUS BLOOD TRANSFUSION ON (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2019. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2. 0 POTASSIUM/2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9085641 ↗InjurySep 19, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019 AND (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 10.5 TO 9. 3. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2019 AND REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2019. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2. 0 POTASSIUM/2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF THE FRESENIUS PRODUCTS USED, AS WELL
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9085633 ↗InjurySep 14, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019 AND (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 11 TO 9.5. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HOWEVER, THEY WERE NOT ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS 180 DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2.0 POTASSIUM/2.5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF THE FRESENIUS PRODUCTS USED, AS WELL AS NO MACHINE ALARMS, CLOTTING EVENTS AND/OR DIALYZER LEAKS IN RELATION TO THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NOTHING UNUSUAL IN ANY OF THE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THERE WERE NO VIS
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9056903 ↗InjurySep 13, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019 AND (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 9.0 TO 6.7. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION ON (B)(6) 2019; HOWEVER, THEY WERE NOT ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS 160 DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2.0 POTASSIUM/2.5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF THE FRESENIUS PRODUCTS USED, AS WELL AS NO MACHINE ALARMS, CLOTTING EVENTS AND/OR DIALYZER LEAKS IN RELATION TO THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NOTHING UNUSUAL IN ANY OF THE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. T
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9050420 ↗InjurySep 13, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 12.5 TO 11.1. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL DUE TO WEAKNESS ON (B)(6) 2019 WITH A HEMOGLOBIN OF 8.6 AND REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2019. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2.0 POTASSIUM/2.5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF THE FRESENIUS
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9050345 ↗InjurySep 13, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 12 TO 9. 6. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2019 WITH A HEMOGLOBIN OF 7. 7 AND REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION AND DISCHARGE DATE ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2.0 POTASSIUM/2.5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR ANYTHING UNEXPECTED WITH ANY OF THE FRESENIUS PRODUCTS USED, AS WELL AS NO MACHINE ALAR
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9047520 ↗InjurySep 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 8.9 TO 7.2. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL DUE TO WEAKNESS ON (B)(6) 2019 WITH A HEMOGLOBIN OF 5.9 AND POSITIVE SCHISTOCYTES. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2019. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS 160 AND 180 DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2.0 POTASSIUM/2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESENIUS NORMAL SALINE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WERE NO VISUAL DEFECTS OR
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9014463 ↗InjurySep 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019 AND (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB/ SPECIMEN. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 8. 7 TO 8. 4. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED INTO THE HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2019 WITH COMPLAINTS OF WEAKNESS AND REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. THE PATIENT ALSO HAS A HISTORY OF UNSPECIFIED BLOOD DISORDER AND PREVIOUS BLOOD TRANSFUSION ON (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2019. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DIALYZING WITH A FRESENIUS 2008T HEMODIALYSIS MACHINE, FRESENIUS BLOODLINES, FRESENIUS DIALYZERS, FRESENIUS GRANUFLO ACID (2551) 2. 0 POTASSIUM/2. 5 CALCIUM, FRESENIUS NATURALYTE 4000 BICARBONATE, FRESENIUS CLIC BLOOD CHAMBER AND FRESE
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9013944 ↗InjurySep 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN AREA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANAGER (ATOM) REPORTED THAT A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEMOLYSIS EVENT. UPON FOLLOW UP, THE HEMOLYSIS EVENT APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT'S PRE-HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT LABS WERE DRAWN ON (B)(6) 2019 WITHOUT ANY REPORTED ISSUES WITH THE LAB SPECIMEN. ON 06/19/2019, THE CLINIC MANAGER REVIEWED THE LAB RESULTS WHICH WERE DRAWN POST HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENT AND NOTICED THE PATIENT HAD A DROP IN THEIR BASELINE HEMOGLOBIN FROM 10.5 TO 9.3. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2019 AND REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSION. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED (B)(6) 2019. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO RECEIVE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NOTHING UNUSUAL IN ANY OF THE HEMODIALYSIS TREATMENTS. THIS WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION ON 08/19/2019 AND AS OF (B)(6) 2019 NO CAUSE OF HEMOLYSIS WAS DETERMINED.
Patient problems: Hemolysis
MAUDE report 9013894 ↗
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page