OlmypusRecalls & reported problems across all models
OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · 3 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
2 open recalls name at least one Olmypus model. Check whether yours is affected in the recall details, and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 32
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 8
- Recalls
- 2
We found 3 models of Olmypus by OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 32 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Mar 12, 2022 and Jul 2, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries, 24 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (25 reports).
2 FDA recall records name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 2 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Olmypus recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Nov 11, 2025Open, Classified
Complaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Z-1454-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Nov 11, 2025Open, Classified
Complaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Z-1450-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported Olmypus problems
Device problems
- Break25
- Material Separation2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Fracture1
- Material Fragmentation1
- Poor Quality Image1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions29
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- Chest Pain1
- Myocardial Infarction1
Olmypus models
3 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Olmypus WA22017AResectoscope1 recall31 reports
- Olmypus A37004AEndoscope, Ac-Powered And Accessories1 recall0 reports
- Olmypus WA63728AMediastinoscope, Surgical1 report
Recent Olmypus adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 2, 2026Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE TIP BROKE OFF AT THE DISTAL END, DEVICE OUTSIDE PATIENT. THIS OCCURRED DURING AN UNSPECIFIED DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE INVOLVING A RIGID ENDOSCOPE SHEATH, CAUSING A PROCEDURAL DELAY OF LESS THAN 30 MINUTES. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING AN OLYMPUS BACKUP DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY OR HARM WAS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25700100 ↗MalfunctionJun 8, 2026Material Fragmentation
THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE RIGID ENDOSCOPE SHEATH, WHICH IS AN OLYMPUS ASSET WITH NO REPORTED COMPLAINT. DURING THE EVALUATION OF THE DEVICE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CERAMIC TIP IS BROKEN. THE INVESTIGATION CENTER ASSESSED THE CONDITION AND DETERMINED THAT THE DAMAGE WAS MOST LIKELY DUE TO STRESS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25425419 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CERAMIC TIP OF THE SHEATH WAS BROKEN. THE ISSUE WAS FOUND DURING REPROCESSING. NO HARM REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24631185 ↗MalfunctionOct 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE HAD A BROKEN CERAMIC TIP. THE ISSUE WAS OBSERVED DURING INSTALLATION. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23324386 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2025Break; Break
DURING A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOR, A PIECE OF THE INNER SHEATH BROKE OFF IN THE BLADDER. THE SHEATH WAS REMOVED AND EXCHANGED, THEN THE PHYSICIAN UTILIZED A GRASPER TO PULL OUT THE BROKEN SHEATH. THERE WAS NO TRAUMA NOTED IN THE BLADDER OR THE URETHRA DURING EXTRACTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22341366 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2025Break; Break
DURING A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOR, A PIECE OF THE INNER SHEATH BROKE OFF IN THE BLADDER. THE SHEATH WAS REMOVED AND EXCHANGED, THEN THE PHYSICIAN UTILIZED A GRASPER TO PULL OUT THE BROKEN SHEATH. THERE WAS NO TRAUMA NOTED IN THE BLADDER OR THE URETHRA DURING EXTRACTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22341297 ↗MalfunctionJun 25, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS OBSERVED THAT DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE INNER SHEATH, LONG, THE CERAMIC TIP WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22326485 ↗MalfunctionJan 31, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF INNER SHEATH WAS BROKEN. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING REPROCESSING. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21283047 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE BROKE OFF DURING A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOR (TURBT). THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BLADDER WITH A FORCEPS AND THE PATIENT'S HEALTH WAS NOT IMPACTED. THEY REPORTED THERE WAS UP TO A 10 MINUTE DELAY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19737697 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE BROKE OFF DURING A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOR (TURBT). THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BLADDER WITH A FORCEPS AND THE PATIENT'S HEALTH WAS NOT IMPACTED. THEY REPORTED THERE WAS UP TO A 10 MINUTE DELAY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19737696 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE BROKE OFF DURING A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOR (TURBT). THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BLADDER WITH A FORCEPS AND THE PATIENT'S HEALTH WAS NOT IMPACTED. THEY REPORTED THERE WAS UP TO A 10 MINUTE DELAY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19737693 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS OBSERVED DURING THE DEVICE INSPECTION, THAT THE SHEATH EXHIBITED A BROKEN BEAK. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19705006 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE REUSABLE ENDOSCOPE SHEATH HAD A CHIP OUT OF THE TIP OF THE INSTRUMENT. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING UNBOXING AND WAS AN OUT OF BOX FAILURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM OR INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19552673 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED, THE INNER SHEATH, LONG, FOR WA22018A AND WA22019A EXHIBITED A BROKEN CERAMIC TIP. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING REPROCESSING. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19381523 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PLASTIC PIECES BROKE OFF FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE ENDOSCOPE SHEATH. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19352830 ↗
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page