OmnicurveRecalls & reported problems across all models
Stryker Corporation · 4 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 35
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls
- 0
We found 4 models of Omnicurve by Stryker Corporation in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 35 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Mar 20, 2023 and Sep 15, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 28 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (34 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported Omnicurve problems
Device problems
- Fracture34
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient18
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions17
Omnicurve models
4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Omnicurve 1032-115-000Arthroscope20 reports
- Omnicurve 1032-120-000CEMENT, BONE, VERTEBROPLASTY13 reports
- Omnicurve 1032015000Arthroscope1 report
- Omnicurve 1032020000Arthroscope1 report
Recent Omnicurve adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 15, 2026Fracture
It was reported that the OmniCurve sheath broke off and was left in the patient. There was no medical intervention, no adverse consequences and no clinically significant surgical delay.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 50779258 ↗MalfunctionAug 12, 2026Fracture
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 50226034 ↗MalfunctionMay 14, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SHEATH BROKE AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE SHEATH WAS NOT ABLE TO BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25172983 ↗MalfunctionMay 12, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PIECE OF THE CANNULA WAS LEFT IN THE PEDICLE OF THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS CANCELLED AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION TO PREVENT PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25148163 ↗MalfunctionMay 6, 2026
DURING THE L3 KYPHOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE PEAK SHEATH FROM THE OMNICURVE CURVED NEEDLE FRACTURED AND BECAME EMBEDDED IN THE CEMENT WITHIN THE L3 VERTEBRAL BODY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25093093 ↗MalfunctionApr 16, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SHEATH BROKE AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE SHEATH WAS NOT ABLE TO BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24899459 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER COMPLETING OMNICURVE CASE AND REMOVING INSTRUMENTS THAT SOME DISTAL PORTION OF PEEK SHEATH HAD BROKEN OFF AND WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24805444 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE OMNICURVE INTRODUCER PEAK BROKE OFF WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WAS USING A MALLET ACROSS THE BONE. THE PEAK SHEATH WAS NOT LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY; NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24630299 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SHEATH BROKE AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE SHEATH WAS NOT ABLE TO BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24627018 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SHEATH BROKE AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE SHEATH WAS NOT ABLE TO BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24561352 ↗MalfunctionDec 22, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE CONDUIT BROKE AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23872299 ↗MalfunctionAug 20, 2025Fracture; Fracture
NO NEW INFORMATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22849186 ↗MalfunctionAug 13, 2025Fracture; Fracture
MalfunctionJul 10, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PORTION OF THE PEAK SHEATH WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY; NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22472673 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PIECE OF THE BALLOON MAY HAVE BEEN LEFT IN THE PATIENT AFTER IT RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY; NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 21710748 ↗
Other Stryker Corporation products
- RemB7 models · 3,073 reports
- Prime Series21 models · 1,548 reports · 2 recalls
- TARGET114 models · 1,077 reports
- ProCuity17 models · 368 reports · 13 recalls
- Spetzler-Malis20 models · 7 reports · 19 recalls
- SYNCHRO 28 models · 313 reports · 9 recalls
- Neptune E-SEP19 models · 412 reports · 7 recalls
- StrykeFlow4 models · 552 reports · 4 recalls
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page