PeriVac KitRecalls & reported problems across all models
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · 4 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
2 open recalls name at least one PeriVac Kit model. Check whether yours is affected in the recall details, and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 8
- Recalls
- 2
We found 4 models of PeriVac Kit by Merit Medical Systems, Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 9 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Oct 5, 2021 and Jun 25, 2024 — classified as 8 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (2 reports).
2 FDA recall records name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 2 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
PeriVac Kit recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Jun 11, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified
Medical convenience kits contain plastic syringes affected by the FDA Safety Alert issued on March 19, 2024. Leaks, breakage, and/ other quality issues have been identified that may pose a risk to patient health.
Z-2579-2024 · Root cause: No Marketing Application · names 2 of these models · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Jun 11, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified
Medical convenience kits contain plastic syringes affected by the FDA Safety Alert issued on March 19, 2024. Leaks, breakage, and/ other quality issues have been identified that may pose a risk to patient health.
Z-2565-2024 · Root cause: No Marketing Application · names 2 of these models · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported PeriVac Kit problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7
- Difficult to Advance2
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
- Material Too Soft/Flexible1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Pericardial Effusion2
- Insufficient Information1
PeriVac Kit models
4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- PeriVac™ Kit 00884450486115Fluid drainage tray1 recall8 reports
- PeriVac™ Kit 00884450486139Universal drainage tray1 recall1 report
- PeriVac™ Kit 00884450486061Fluid drainage tray1 recall0 reports
- PeriVac™ Kit 00884450486122Universal drainage tray1 recall0 reports
Recent PeriVac Kit adverse event reports
The 9 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 25, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE PC DRAIN WAS UNABLE TO ENTER THE PERICARDIUM DURING THE EMERGENT EFFUSION EVENT. A STIFFER DILATOR WAS OPENED AND USED. THE DRAIN WAS THEN SUCCESSFULLY INSERTED AND USED. PATIENT WAS NOT HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE AT THE TIME.
Patient problems: Pericardial Effusion
MAUDE report 19608565 ↗InjuryApr 4, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A CASE REPORT PUBLISHED IN JUNE/JULY 2021 INDICATED THAT AN 80-YEAR OLD WOMAN WITH A HISTORY OF PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION UNDERWENT THE LARIAT LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE (LAA) LITIGATION PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNEVENTFUL AND AT THE END A STRAIGHT PERICARDIAL DRAIN WAS PLACED TO ALLOW FURTHER EVACUATION OF THE SPACE FROM THE LIGATED LAA. THE PATIENT DID WELL FOR THE FIRST 18 HOURS WITH NO FURTHER DRAINAGE. THE NEXT MORNING, THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF SIGNIFICATION CHEST PAIN AND MANY BOUTS OF DEEP COUGHING. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THAT THE PATIENT'S PERICARDIAL DRAIN STARTING PUTTING OUT A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF DARK VENOUS BLOOD SUGGESTIVE OF POSSIBLE RECURRENT PERICARDIAL EFFUSION. A TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY DID NOT REVEAL ANY PERICARDIAL FLUID. THE PATIENT WAS EXAMINED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY WHERE THE TIP OF THE DRAIN WAS NOT CLEARLY VISIBLE IN THE PERICARDIAL SPACE. CONTRAST INJECTION THROUGH PERICARDIAL DRAIN CONFIRMED ITS LOCATION IN THE HEPATIC VEIN INFERIOR VENA CAVA (IVC) CONFLUENCE. COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY(CT) ALSO WAS PERFORMED AND IDENTIFIED THAT THE PERICARDIAL DRAIN HAS MIGRATED INTO THE IVC AND THE TIP WAS IN THE MIDDLE HEPATIC VEIN. THIS CONFIRMED THE MIGRATION OF THE PER
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16675237 ↗InjuryNov 2, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THEY HAD AN ISSUE WITH PERFORATIONS DURING PROCEDURES. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS EVENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15714411 ↗MalfunctionSep 20, 2022Difficult to Advance; Material Too Soft/Flexible; Difficult to Advance; Material Too Soft/Flexible
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THEY EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY ADVANCING THE CATHETER OVER THE WIRE IN THE PERICARDIAL SPACE DUE TO THE CATHETER IN THE KIT BEING 'TOO FLIMSY'. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PERICARDIAL TAMPONADE SO THE CLINICAN USED AN INQWIRE AMPLATZ STIFF GUIDE WIRE TO SUCCESSFULLY ADVANCE THE CATHETER IN TOT HE PERICARDIAL SPACE. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL AND THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE WAS TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15455318 ↗InjuryMar 16, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE DEVICE DIDN'T ADEQUATELY DRAIN THE FLUID FROM THE PATIENT'S PAERICARDIAL SACK DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13778743 ↗InjuryMar 16, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE DEVICE DIDN'T ADEQUATELY DRAIN THE FLUID FROM THE PATIENT'S PAERICARDIAL SACK DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13778742 ↗InjuryMar 16, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE DEVICE DIDN'T ADEQUATELY DRAIN THE FLUID FROM THE PATIENT'S PAERICARDIAL SACK DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13778738 ↗InjuryMar 16, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE DEVICE DIDN'T ADEQUATELY DRAIN THE FLUID FROM THE PATIENT'S PAERICARDIAL SACK DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13778733 ↗InjuryOct 5, 2021Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult to Advance; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult to Advance
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE PROVIDER DIAGNOSED A PERICARDIAL EFFUSION DURING AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. A PERIVAC KIT WAS OPENED AND ACCESS TO THE PERICARDIAL SPACED WAS OBTAINED VIA NEEDLE AND WIRE PROVIDED IN KIT. HOWEVER, THE CATHETER WAS NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE OVER THE WIRE AND INTO THE PERICARDIAL SPACE. SINCE THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE THE NEW CATHETER INTO POSITION, THE EFFUSION CONTINUED TO IMPACT THE PATIENT HEMODYNAMICALLY. THEREFORE, THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE OPERATING ROOM TO ADDRESS THE EFFUSION SURGICALLY.
Patient problems: Pericardial Effusion
MAUDE report 12576887 ↗
Other Merit Medical Systems, Inc. products
- Aspira11 models · 36 reports · 10 recalls
- Impress145 models · 481 reports
- Monarch6 models · 37 reports · 7 recalls
- Bridge Prep Kit4 models · 6 reports · 3 recalls
- Prelude Roadster33 models · 1 reports · 3 recalls
- basixTOUCH6 models · 1 reports · 3 recalls
- basixCOMPAK34 models · 34 reports · 2 recalls
- Flex-Neck11 models · 21 reports · 2 recalls
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page