RebarRecalls & reported problems across all models
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · 4 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 27
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls
- 0
We found 4 models of Rebar by Micro Therapeutics, Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 27 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Aug 17, 2019 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 26 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (18 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported Rebar problems
Device problems
- Physical Resistance/Sticking18
- Retraction Problem8
- Break3
- Packaging Problem3
- Material Deformation2
- Burst Container or Vessel1
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions23
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Clinical Endoleak1
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Intracranial Hemorrhage1
- Obstruction/Occlusion1
- Rupture1
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
Rebar models
4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Rebar 105-5081-153Catheter, continuous flush12 reports
- Rebar 105-5081-153Catheter, continuous flush7 reports
- Rebar 105-5082-145Catheter, continuous flush4 reports
- Rebar 105-5083-153Catheter, continuous flush4 reports
Recent Rebar adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50938713 ↗InjurySep 29, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
Medtronic received a report that a Solitaire AB stent was damaged during the procedure and encountered resistance The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a M1 ischemic stroke. The mRS baseline and procedure score was 1. The NIHSS baseline and post procedure score was 1. The TICI score baseline and post procedure was 0. IV TPA (intravenous tissue plasminogen activator) was not contraindicated. There were 2 passes with the device. It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was normal. Stroke onset to reperfusion time was 2 hours. It was reported that the patient had acute cerebral infarction and underwent thrombectomy in the right middle cerebral artery M1 segment. During the procedure, the SAB-6-30 was used for thrombectomy. During delivery through the middle segment of the Rebar18, the stent became stuck in the microcatheter. After the stent was removed, it was observed that the tail end of the stent had a kink, and the tail end of the stent was severely deformed. After the stent was replaced, the procedure proceeded smoothly. The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (IFU). No patient symptoms or complication
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50936804 ↗MalfunctionSep 24, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50888672 ↗MalfunctionSep 24, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50888609 ↗MalfunctionSep 17, 2026Retraction Problem; Difficult to Advance
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50805378 ↗MalfunctionSep 4, 2026Break; Packaging Problem
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50611458 ↗MalfunctionAug 21, 2026Retraction Problem; Material Deformation
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50372706 ↗MalfunctionJul 27, 2026Packaging Problem
Medtronic received report that after opening the Rebar catheter box, it was observed that the sterile seal on the plastic pouch as not sealed; the sterile package was open. The device was not prepared or used. The Rebar catheter was replaced to continue the procedure. The issue was observed prior to use, thus there was no patient involvement.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50017943 ↗MalfunctionJun 9, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE OPERATOR PLANNED TO TREAT TERMINAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS USING AN SAB-6-20 STENT. AFTER THE STENT DELIVERY MICROCATHETER (REBAR-18) WAS POSITIONED, DIFFICULTY WAS FELT DURING HYDRATION AND DELIVERY OF THE STENT, WITH A VERY ROUGH TACTILE FEEL INTRAOPERATIVELY. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE UNSUCCESSFUL, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AFTER USING ANOTHER STENT INSTEAD. RESISTANCE OCCURRED IN THE MIDDLE SECTION OF THE CATHETER. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONSWERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF STENOSIS AT THE TERMINAL SEGMENT OF THE RIGHT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED RESISTANCE OCCURRED AT THE MIDDLE SECTION OF THE CATHETER. THERE WERE NOT ANY DAMAGES ON THE CATHETEROR THE PUSHWIRE OF THE SOLITAIRE, AND THE TIP OF THE SOLITARE WAS SECURED INTO THE HUB OF THE MICRO CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25447979 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THERE WAS RESISTANCE DURING DELIVERY OF THE SOLITAIRE WITHIN THE MIDDLE OF THE REBAR-18 CATHETER. IN ADDITION, THE SOLITAIRE STENT WAS FOUND KINKED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF AN ISCHEMIC STROKE LOCATED IN THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY. THE MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE (MRS) SCORE AT BASELINE WAS 4, AND THE MRS SCORE AT THE TIME OF THE PROCEDURE WAS 4. THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE (NIHSS) SCORE AT BASELINE WAS 16, AND 4 POST PROCEDURE. THE THROMBOLYSIS IN CEREBRAL INFARCTION (TICI) SCORE AT BASELINE WAS 0 AND 3 POST PROCEDURE. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA THE FEMORAL ARTERY, WITH AN ACCESS VESSEL DIAMETER OF 10 MM. THE TIME FROM STROKE ONSET TO REPERFUSION WAS 5 HOURS. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS PERFORMING A LEFT-SIDED MIDDLE CEREBRAL INFARCTION SURGERY. THE PHYSICIAN CONSIDERED USING A STENT FOR THROMBECTOMY AND SELECTED AN SFR-4-20 STENT. HOWEVER, WHEN ENTERING THE MID-SECTION OF THE REBAR18 MICROCATHETER, SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE WAS FELT WHEN THE STENT WAS WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER, AND THE STENT BECAME STUCK IN THE M
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25331821 ↗MalfunctionMay 15, 2026Retraction Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT A SOLITAIRE FR STENT BECAME STUCK DURING USE. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING THROMBECTOMY SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A ISCHEMIC STROKE IN THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. INTRAVENOUS TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR (IV TPA) WAS NOT CONTRAINDICATED IN THIS CASE. THE PROCEDURE INVOLVED ONE PASS WITH THE DEVICE. THE STROKE ONSET TO REPERFUSION TIME WAS 107 MINUTES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SOLITAIRE FR STUCK IN PATIENT'S BODY WITH THE MICROCATHETER, AND RETRIEVAL FAILED. AFTER REPLACING THE STENT, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. THE LESION WAS A LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY ANEURYSM WITH TERMINAL OCCLUSION. THE VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. THE REPORTED STATEMENT OF ¿THE SOLITAIRE FR STUCK IN PATIENT¿S BODY WITH THE MICROCATHETER, AND RETRIEVAL FAILED¿ WAS CLARIFIED TO BE AS FOLLOWS: AFTER THE SOLITAIRE FR WAS PUSHED OUT FROM THE MICROCATHETER, REPOSITIONING WAS DESIRED DUE TO SUBOPT
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25187452 ↗MalfunctionApr 17, 2026Retraction Problem; Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT SOLITAIRE STENT COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE REBAR MICROCATHETER. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING STENT ASSISTED COIL EMBOLIZATION SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF AN UNRUPTURED, SACCULAR, LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY CAVERNOUS SEGMENT ANEURYSM. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS SEVERE. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA THE FEMORAL ARTERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE STENT MICROCATHETER WAS POSITIONED IN PLACE AND THE COIL DELIVERY MICROCATHETER WAS ADVANCED INTO POSITION, STENT DELIVERY WAS THEN INITIATED, AND WHEN REACHING THE PRE-CURVED SEGMENT OF THE CAVERNOUS SINUS SEGMENT, RESISTANCE WAS VERY LARGE AND THE STENT BECAME STUCK; DURING WITHDRAWAL, THE STENT WAS LODGED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER AND COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN, THEREFORE THE STENT AND THE MICROCATHETER WERE REMOVED TOGETHER, RESISTANCE WAS STILL ENCOUNTERED DURING EX VIVO ATTEMPTS, THE OPERATOR SUSPECTED THAT THE STENT AND THE MICROCATHETER HAD ALREADY SUSTAINED DAMAGE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING WITH A NEW STENT AND A NEW MICROCATHETER. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCES
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24911506 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2026Loss of or Failure to Bond; Retraction Problem; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR THROMBECTOMY OF THE M1 SEGMENT OF THE RIGHT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE. THE ACCESS VESSEL WAS THE FEMORAL ARTERY, WITH 8MM DIAMETER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE, AFTER DEPLOYMENT OF THE THROMBECTOMY STENT, THE OPERATOR WAS UNABLE TO WITH DRAW THE REBAR 18 WHILE PULLING IT BACK THROUGH THE WALLABY INTERMEDIATE CATHETER. INTRAOPERATIVELY, THE OPERATOR PERCEIVED THAT THE RESISTANCE WAS CAUSED BY INTERACTION BETWEEN THE OUTER COATING OF THE REBAR AND THE INNER COATING OF THE INTERMEDIATE CATHETER, AND THE RESISTANCE WAS SIGNIFICANT IN THE MIDDLE SECTION. AFTER MULTIPLE FORCEFUL WITHDRAWAL ATTEMPTS, THE REBAR 18 WAS EVENTUALLY REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE THEN PROCEEDED SMOOTHLY, WITH SUCCESSFUL RECANALIZATION AND CLOT RETRIEVAL. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A WALLABY 5F 125CM ESPERANCE INTERMEDIATE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24817409 ↗MalfunctionFeb 5, 2026Break; Insufficient Device Problem Information
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE ARTISSE DEVICE HAD MOVEMENT UPON DETACHMENT. IT IS NOT BELIEVED THAT THE REBAR CATHETER WAS THE CAUSE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24269280 ↗MalfunctionDec 29, 2025Retraction Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Retraction Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THE CAUSE OF THE RESISTANCE/STUCK WAS NOT DETERMINED. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED IN THE DISTAL SECTION OF THE CATHETER. A CONTINUOUS SALINE FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED AND MAINTAINED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23909091 ↗
Other Micro Therapeutics, Inc. products
- PipelineTM Flex Embolization Device with Shield TechnologyTM79 models · 1,020 reports
- AxiumTM139 models · 832 reports · 1 recall
- PIPELINE114 models · 622 reports · 1 recall
- Concerto Detachable Coil System34 models · 595 reports
- Axium Prime Detachable Coil System70 models · 497 reports
- ConcertoTM70 models · 436 reports
- EchelonTM5 models · 225 reports · 2 recalls
- Axium Detachable Coil System69 models · 288 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page