VertePortRecalls & reported problems across all models
Stryker Corporation · 2 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls
- 1
We found 2 models of VertePort by Stryker Corporation in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 2 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Nov 21, 2018 and May 8, 2019 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination /Decontamination Problem” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name at least one of these models by its device identifier.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
VertePort recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Nov 9, 2017Terminated
Lack of sterility assurance as bioburden levels were found to be higher than internal acceptable rates.
Z-1247-2018 · Root cause: Environmental control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported VertePort problems
Device problems
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Delivered as Unsterile Product1
- Unsealed Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Patient Involvement2
VertePort models
2 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- VertePort 0306511000Injector, vertebroplasty (does not contain cement)1 recall0 reports
- VertePort 0306410000Injector, vertebroplasty (does not contain cement)2 reports
Recent VertePort adverse event reports
The 2 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 8, 2019Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A HAIR IN THE STERILE PACKAGING. THERE WAS NO ASSOCIATED PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8591244 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2018Unsealed Device Packaging; Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Unsealed Device Packaging; Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STERILE PACKAGING TORE DOWN SIDEWAYS UPON OPENING THE DEVICE AND CONTAMINATED THE PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO ASSOCIATED PROCEDURE AND THEREFORE, NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8096209 ↗
Other Stryker Corporation products
- RemB7 models · 3,073 reports
- Prime Series21 models · 1,548 reports · 2 recalls
- TARGET114 models · 1,077 reports
- ProCuity17 models · 368 reports · 13 recalls
- Spetzler-Malis20 models · 7 reports · 19 recalls
- SYNCHRO 28 models · 313 reports · 9 recalls
- Neptune E-SEP19 models · 412 reports · 7 recalls
- StrykeFlow4 models · 552 reports · 4 recalls
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page