Skip to content

INTERLINK 2C6671Recalls & reported problems

Baxter International Inc. · Extension Set, 0.2 Micron Filter Injection Site, Male Luer Lock Adapter with Retractable Collar · Class 2

All models of INTERLINK (17)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00085412003993), received between Jun 19, 2018 and Jan 29, 2026 — classified as 10 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (4 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K153158); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 2 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fluid/Blood Leak4
  • Reflux within Device3
  • Precipitate in Device or Device Ingredient2
  • Backflow1
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 29, 2026Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTERLINK SYSTEM EXTENSION SET LEAKED FLUID DOWN AROUND THE TUBING ONTO THE FLOOR. THE ISSUE WAS OBSERVED DURING PRIMING, AFTER SPIKING A NORMAL SALINE 250 ML BAG OF REMICADE. IT WAS FURTHER SPECIFIED THAT THE "SPIKE PIERCED THROUGH PLASTIC AT ENTRY POINT AT AN ANGLE CAUSING THE SIDE WALL OF THE ENTRY PORT TO RUPTURE". NEW DOSE OF REMICADE WAS DISPENSED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24217992 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2024Break; Fluid/Blood Leak; Break; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTERLINK SYSTEM EXTENSION SET BROKE RESULTING IN A BLOOD LEAK; A "POP" WAS HEARD AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT. THIS WAS OBSERVED DURING PATIENT INFUSION. THE SET WAS DISCONNECTED TO RESOLVE THE EVENT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20674635 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 14, 2024Precipitate in Device or Device Ingredient; Precipitate in Device or Device Ingredient

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTERLINK SYSTEM EXTENSION SET HAD DARK BROWN, RUST-LOOKING SEDIMENTS SEEN IN THE FILTER TUBING. THIS WAS OBSERVED AFTER COMPLETION OF INFUSION WITH AMIODARONE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19309407 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2024Precipitate in Device or Device Ingredient; Precipitate in Device or Device Ingredient

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTERLINK SYSTEM EXTENSION SET HAD DARK BROWN, RUST-LOOKING SEDIMENTS SEEN IN THE FILTER TUBING. THIS WAS OBSERVED AFTER COMPLETION OF INFUSION WITH AMIODARONE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19298902 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2023Backflow; Backflow

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BLOOD WAS BACKING UP THE TUBING OF THREE (3) INTERLINK SYSTEM EXTENSION SETS. THE FILTER ON THE SETS DID NOT FILL WITH FLUID. THIS WAS OBSERVED DURING PATIENT INFUSION. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16599867 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 15, 2021Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTERLINK SYSTEM EXTENSION SET LEAKED FROM UNSPECIFIED LOCATION. THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCESS STEP PRIOR TO USE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12174897 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2019Reflux within Device; Reflux within Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS BACKFLOW IN AN UNSPECIFIED NUMBER OF INTERLINK SOLUTION ADMINISTRATION SETS WHILE IN USE ON A PATIENT. IT WAS STATED THAT THE NURSE PRIMED THE IV (INTRAVENOUS) TUBING AND FILTER AND ATTACHED IT TO THE PATIENT¿S CENTRAL LINE. THE EXTENSION SET WAS POSITIONED NEAR THE PATIENT¿S ARM AT OR BELOW THE LEVEL OF THE PATIENT¿S HEART. SUBSEQUENTLY BLOOD BACKED UP INTO THE FILTER. WHEN THE NURSE PICKED UP THE SET, THE BLOOD AND FLUID DRAINED BACK TO THE PATIENT, BUT AFTER THAT THERE WAS NO FLUID (JUST AIR) IN THE LINE FROM THE FILTER TO THE PATIENT; FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ¿DRAINED DRY¿ FROM THE FILTER TO THE PATIENT. THE NURSE EXCHANGED THE EXTENSION SET SEVERAL TIMES (EXACT NUMBER UNKNOWN) AND EACH TIME THE SAME THING HAPPENED. EVENTUALLY THE ADMINISTRATION SET DID WORK AFTER TRYING SEVERAL NEW SETS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8429766 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2019Reflux within Device; Reflux within Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS BACKFLOW IN AN UNSPECIFIED NUMBER OF INTERLINK SOLUTION ADMINISTRATION SETS WHILE IN USE ON A PATIENT. IT WAS STATED THAT THE NURSE PRIMED THE IV (INTRAVENOUS) TUBING AND FILTER AND ATTACHED IT TO THE PATIENT¿S CENTRAL LINE. THE EXTENSION SET WAS POSITIONED NEAR THE PATIENT¿S ARM AT OR BELOW THE LEVEL OF THE PATIENT¿S HEART. SUBSEQUENTLY BLOOD BACKED UP INTO THE FILTER. WHEN THE NURSE PICKED UP THE SET, THE BLOOD AND FLUID DRAINED BACK TO THE PATIENT, BUT AFTER THAT THERE WAS NO FLUID (JUST AIR) IN THE LINE FROM THE FILTER TO THE PATIENT; FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ¿DRAINED DRY¿ FROM THE FILTER TO THE PATIENT. THE NURSE EXCHANGED THE EXTENSION SET SEVERAL TIMES (EXACT NUMBER UNKNOWN) AND EACH TIME THE SAME THING HAPPENED. EVENTUALLY THE ADMINISTRATION SET DID WORK AFTER TRYING SEVERAL NEW SETS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8429761 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2019Reflux within Device; Reflux within Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS BACKFLOW IN AN UNSPECIFIED NUMBER OF INTERLINK SOLUTION ADMINISTRATION SETS WHILE IN USE ON A PATIENT. IT WAS STATED THAT THE NURSE PRIMED THE IV (INTRAVENOUS) TUBING AND FILTER AND ATTACHED IT TO THE PATIENT¿S CENTRAL LINE. THE EXTENSION SET WAS POSITIONED NEAR THE PATIENT¿S ARM AT OR BELOW THE LEVEL OF THE PATIENT¿S HEART. SUBSEQUENTLY BLOOD BACKED UP INTO THE FILTER. WHEN THE NURSE PICKED UP THE SET, THE BLOOD AND FLUID DRAINED BACK TO THE PATIENT, BUT AFTER THAT THERE WAS NO FLUID (JUST AIR) IN THE LINE FROM THE FILTER TO THE PATIENT; FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ¿DRAINED DRY¿ FROM THE FILTER TO THE PATIENT. THE NURSE EXCHANGED THE EXTENSION SET SEVERAL TIMES (EXACT NUMBER UNKNOWN) AND EACH TIME THE SAME THING HAPPENED. EVENTUALLY THE ADMINISTRATION SET DID WORK AFTER TRYING SEVERAL NEW SETS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8429720 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 19, 2018Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FILTER OF AN INTERLINK SOLUTION ADMINISTRATION SET FILLED WITH AIR AND LEAKED TOTAL PARENTERAL NUTRITION (TPN) FROM THE END OF THE TUBING. THIS EVENT OCCURRED WHILE PRIMING THE DEVICE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT ONCE THE DEVICE LEAKED IT WAS THEN REPRIMED AND THE FILTER WAS ADJUSTED. THE DEVICE LEAKED TPN SOLUTION AGAIN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7614277 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K153158. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0196-2026 · Aug 29, 2025 · Open, Classified
    CLEARLINK SYSTEM CONTINU-FLO Solution Set, Non-Vented, 0.2 Micron Filter, three CLEARLINK Luer Activated Valves, Backcheck Valve, 10 drops/mL, 102-inch (2.6 meters), Product Code 2
  • Z-0195-2026 · Aug 29, 2025 · Open, Classified
    CLEARLINK SYSTEM CONTINU-FLO Solution Set, Non-Vented, 0.2 Micron Filter, two CLEARLINK Luer Activated Valves, Backcheck Valve, 10 drops/mL, 104-inch (2.6 meters), Product Code 2C8

Other Set, administration, intravascular devices

All Set, administration, intravascular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page