Skip to content

Invictus 15025-075-050Recalls & reported problems

Alphatec Spine, Inc. · Cannulated Extended Tab Polyaxial Reduction Screw, 7.5 mm x 50 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Invictus (96)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00190376117034), received between Aug 26, 2021 and Oct 11, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Material Separation1
  • Separation Failure1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 11, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure

    ON 03/27/2024, A MALE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SPINAL PROCEDURE WHERE POSTERIOR FIXATION WAS IMPLANTED FROM L3 TO S1. DURING A POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP, A RADIOGRAPH IMAGE REVEALED THE BILATERAL SCREWS AT S1 STILL HAD THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE EXTENDED TABS ATTACHED TO THE SCREW TULIP. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC, AND THERE ARE NO PLANS FOR REVISION SURGERY. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 20432720 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation

    A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO EXTEND A PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED CONSTRUCT TO ADDRESS DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE. A SCREW ADJUSTER WAS USED TO REMOVE A SCREW. AFTER REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTED THE LOAD RING ON THE SCREW WAS DEFORMED AND DISLOCATED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15607481 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2021Break

    A MIS REDUCTION SCREW TULIP BROKE PREMATURELY AT THE DISTAL WELD AND BREAK POINT DURING SURGERY. THE SCREW WAS BEING PLACED AT S1. IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12372150 ↗

Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices

All APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page