28 Ferno Flex Roll In Chair Cot 0012801Recalls & reported problems
Ferno-Washington, Inc. · 28 Ferno Flex Roll In Chair Cot · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00190790000097), received between Jan 6, 2026 and Jan 6, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 6, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
AN INCIDENT OCCURRING IN THAILAND ON A 2022 MODEL 28 STRETCHER WAS REPORTED BY A DISTRIBUTOR REPRESENTATIVE. PER THE END USER A HEAVY PATIENT WAS LOADED INTO THE AMBULANCE AND BECAUSE THE WERE HAVING TROUBLE BREATHING IN THE BED POSITION WHILE IN THE AMBULANCE, THE EMS PERSONNEL ADJUSTED THE BACKREST OF THE STRETCHER TO AN UPRIGHT POSITION. THE STRETCHER WAS THEN UNLOADED FROM THE AMBULANCE BEFORE RETURNING THE BACKREST TO THE FULLY RECLINED POSITION AND AS THE WHEELS TOUCHED THE GROUND A SCREW IN THE BACKREST ALLEGEDLY CAME LOOSE AND BROKE. THE PATIENT REMAINED IN A SEMI-RECLINING POSITION ON THE STRETCHER AND NO INJURIES WERE ASSOCIATED; HOWEVER, THE EMS CREW CALL FOR AN ADDITIONAL CREW AND STRETCHER TO ASSIST WITH CONTINUING THE PATIENT TRANSPORT, WHICH RESULTED IN A DELAY. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE DELAY IN TRANSPORT. PICTURES OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE WERE PROVIDED FOR REVIEW. OBSERVATIONS OF RUST ON EXISTING HARDWARE WERE MADE WHICH COULD RESULT IN WEAKNESS OF THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE HARDWARE AND MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE ALLEGED BOLT BREAKING. REPLACEMENT PARTS WERE PROVIDED TO THE DISTRIBUTOR FOR REPAIR OF THEIR CUSTOMER'S STRETCHER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23979701 ↗
Other Stretcher, Wheeled devices
- Power-PRO 6506Stryker Corporation · STRETCHER, WHEELED5 deaths472 reports
- Procedural stretcher P8000HHill-Rom de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. · STRETCHER, WHEELED361 reports
- Prime Series 1115Stryker Corporation · STRETCHER, WHEELED1 death251 reports
- Prime Series 1115Stryker Corporation · STRETCHER, WHEELED1 recall199 reports
- Power-PRO 2, High Configuration 650705550001Stryker Corporation · STRETCHER, WHEELED2 recalls2 deaths99 reports
- NA 1089Stryker Corporation · STRETCHER, WHEELED175 reports
- NA 5050Stryker Corporation · STRETCHER, WHEELED1 recall99 reports
- Power-PRO 2 650700000000Stryker Corporation · STRETCHER, WHEELED2 recalls1 death42 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page