Skip to content

Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 735Recalls & reported problems

Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · 6mm x 35 cm · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Artegraft Vascular Graft (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00316837000282), received between Jan 7, 2022 and Jan 7, 2022 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Sep 2, 2025Class IIOpen, Classified

    The bovine carotid arteries used to produce the impacted grafts from affected lots were sourced using raw material from a supplier that had not been reviewed and approved by the appropriate regulatory authority.

    Z-0034-2026 · Root cause: Nonconforming Material/Component · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 7, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    PATIENT HAD A LEFT ARM BRACHIAL ARTERY TO BRACHIAL VEIN ARTEGRAFT IMPLANTED (B)(6) 2021. ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS REPORTED CLOTTED BY THE DIALYSIS CENTER SO THE DOCTOR PERFORMED A THROMBECTOMY AND PULLED OUT THE CLOT FROM THE ARTERIAL END. THE GRAFT WAS SUCCESSFULLY ACCESSED 3-5 TIMES. ON (B)(6) 2021 IT WAS AGAIN CLOTTED AND THE DOCTOR PERFORMED A SECOND THROMBECTOMY/EXPLORATION AND AGAIN FOUND A CLOT ON THE ARTERIAL END. THE DOCTOR STATED THAT IT LOOKED LIKE ACCESS SITES WERE CLOSER TO THIS END OF GRAFT. VENOUS END WAS OPEN. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE DOCTOR WAS ABLE TO SEE THAT THE MID PORTION OF THE GRAFT LOOKED LIKE THE WALLS OF GRAFT HAD SEPARATED. HE SAID IT APPEARED THAT THE INTIMAL WALL WAS JUST" FREE-FLOATING" LIKE A STRAW WITHIN THE LUMEN OF THE GRAFT. HE WAS WORRIED THAT THE GRAFT WAS FAULTY SO HE LIGATED THE GRAFT. THE PATIENT CONTINUES DIALYSIS ON A CATHETER NOW AND WILL HAVE A NEW GRAFT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6).

    Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 13196877 ↗

Other Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater devices

All Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page