Portex A2693-17/27Recalls & reported problems
Icu Medical, Inc. · Class 2
All models of Portex (409)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00351688058006), received between Feb 23, 2017 and Feb 23, 2017 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Deliver” (2 reports).
7 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K965017); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Deliver2
- Product Quality Problem2
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 23, 2017Product Quality Problem; Failure to Deliver; Product Quality Problem; Failure to Deliver
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PORTEX® COMBINED SPINAL EPIDURAL SYSTEM CATHETER DID NOT HAVE A HOLE AT THE TIP AND FLUID WAS UNABLE TO BE DELIVERED. THE ISSUE WAS OBSERVED DURING A SPINAL ATTEMPT DURING A CESAREAN SECTION PROCEDURE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THIS DEVICE WAS A BACKUP EPIDURAL THAT WAS ATTEMPTED AFTER THE FIRST FAILED ATTEMPT. THE DEVICE WAS PLACED BY ANESTHESIA STAFF. IT WAS OBSERVED AFTER THE EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS REMOVED THAT IT WAS NOT PERFORATED AT THE PATIENT END, 1CM FROM THE CATHETER TIP, AS EXPECTED. GENERAL ANESTHESIA WAS ADMINISTERED TO ADDRESS THE EPIDURAL ISSUE. THE CESAREAN SECTION WAS REPORTED TO BE SUCCESSFUL. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED. SEE MFR: 3012307300-2017-00483.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6354651 ↗InjuryFeb 23, 2017Product Quality Problem; Failure to Deliver; Product Quality Problem; Failure to Deliver
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PORTEX® COMBINED SPINAL EPIDURAL SYSTEM CATHETER DID NOT HAVE A HOLE AT THE TIP AND FLUID WAS UNABLE TO BE DELIVERED. THE ISSUE WAS OBSERVED DURING A SPINAL ATTEMPT DURING A CESAREAN SECTION PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS PLACED BY ANESTHESIA STAFF. IT WAS OBSERVED AFTER THE EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS REMOVED THAT IT WAS NOT PERFORATED AT THE PATIENT END, 1CM FROM THE CATHETER TIP, AS EXPECTED. GENERAL ANESTHESIA WAS ADMINISTERED TO ADDRESS THE EPIDURAL ISSUE. THE CESAREAN SECTION WAS REPORTED TO BE SUCCESSFUL. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED. SEE MFR: 3012307300-2017-00634.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6354650 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K965017. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1101-2026 · Dec 19, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedPortex Spinal Tray, Item No. A3729-24 A3595
- Z-0211-2007 · Oct 27, 2006 · TerminatedPortex Continuous Epidural tray Ref 4948-17
- Z-0243-06 · Nov 17, 2005 · Terminated4903 Glass L.O.R. Syringe
- Z-0245-06 · Nov 17, 2005 · Terminated4950-16 Portex Epidural Mini-pack
- Z-0244-06 · Nov 17, 2005 · Terminated4904 Glass L.O.R. Syringe
- Z-0242-06 · Nov 17, 2005 · Terminated4902 Glass L.O.R. Syringe
- Z-0166-04 · Oct 10, 2003 · TerminatedPortex Spinal Tray with 25G Whitacre Needle. Kit contains Bupivacaine in Dextrose, Epinephrine,Lidocaine, Lidocaine in Dextrose and Tetracaine Catalog Number: 15545-20
Other Anesthesia conduction kit devices
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405671Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall68 reports
- ARROW IPN922678Teleflex Incorporated · Anesthesia conduction kit2 recalls0 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405672Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall27 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405673Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall10 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405637Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall7 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405707Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall4 reports
- BD Glaspak 405675Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405609Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page