Skip to content

OneTouch Verio Reflect 023-878Recalls & reported problems

LifeScan Europe GmbH · Class 2

All models of OneTouch Verio Reflect (5)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00353885011709), received between Nov 12, 2019 and Aug 14, 2024 — classified as 12 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (12 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 2 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings12

Patient problems

  • Shaking/Tremors6
  • Dizziness4
  • Hypoglycemia4
  • Extreme Exhaustion2
  • Fatigue2
  • Headache2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Pallor2

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 14, 2024Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON AUGUST 7, 2024, A PHARMACIST CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) FRANCE ON BEHALF OF THE LAY USER/PATIENT, ALLEGING THAT THE PATIENT¿S ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER READ INACCURATELY HIGH COMPARED TO THEIR FEELINGS AND/OR NORMAL READINGS. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DOCUMENTATION, SINCE THE PATIENT COULD NOT BE CONTACTED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. IT WAS NOT REPORTED WHEN THE ALLEGED METER INACCURACY BEGAN. THE REPORTER CLAIMED THE PATIENT OBTAINED AN INACCURATE HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF ¿242 MG/DL¿ WITH THE SUBJECT METER. IN RESPONSE TO THE ELEVATED READING, THE REPORTER CLAIMED THE PATIENT ADMINISTERED AN INCREASED DOSE OF INSULIN AND AS A RESULT WAS RUSHED TO HOSPITAL AND WAS HOSPITALIZED. THE REPORTER WAS UNABLE TO CONFIRM THE SYMPTOMS EXPERIENCED NOR THE TREATMENT RECEIVED. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE REPORTER WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PATIENT¿S TESTING TECHNIQUE OR CONDITION OF THE TEST STRIPS. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE PROVIDED. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY REQUIRED HOSPITALIZATION AFTER TAKING EXTRA INSULIN BASED ON AN ALLEGED INACCURATE HIGH RESULT OBTAINED WITH THE SUBJECT

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19988087 ↗
  • InjuryAug 14, 2024Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON (B)(6) 2024, A PHARMACIST CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) FRANCE ON BEHALF OF THE LAY USER/PATIENT, ALLEGING THAT THE PATIENT¿S ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER READ INACCURATELY HIGH COMPARED TO THEIR FEELINGS AND/OR NORMAL READINGS. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DOCUMENTATION, SINCE THE PATIENT COULD NOT BE CONTACTED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. IT WAS NOT REPORTED WHEN THE ALLEGED METER INACCURACY BEGAN. THE REPORTER CLAIMED THE PATIENT OBTAINED AN INACCURATE HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF ¿242 MG/DL¿ WITH THE SUBJECT METER. IN RESPONSE TO THE ELEVATED READING, THE REPORTER CLAIMED THE PATIENT ADMINISTERED AN INCREASED DOSE OF INSULIN AND AS A RESULT WAS RUSHED TO HOSPITAL AND WAS HOSPITALIZED. THE REPORTER WAS UNABLE TO CONFIRM THE SYMPTOMS EXPERIENCED NOR THE TREATMENT RECEIVED. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE REPORTER WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PATIENT¿S TESTING TECHNIQUE OR CONDITION OF THE TEST STRIPS. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE PROVIDED. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY REQUIRED HOSPITALIZATION AFTER TAKING EXTRA INSULIN BASED ON AN ALLEGED INACCURATE HIGH RESULT OBTAINED WITH THE SUBJECT ME

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19988085 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2023Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON (B)(6) 2023, THE REPORTER (A SALES REPRESENTATIVE) OF THE PATIENT/LAY USER CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) SPAIN ALLEGING THAT THE PATIENT¿S ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER READ INACCURATELY LOW COMPARED TO A LABORATORY TEST. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DURING THE INITIAL CALL, SINCE THE PATIENT WAS UNABLE TO BE REACHED BY PHONE FOR FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS. THE REPORTER DID NOT SPECIFY WHEN THE ALLEGED ISSUE STARTED. THE REPORTER STATED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED A LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF ¿20/30 MG/DL¿ ON THE SUBJECT METER. THE REPORTER DID NOT HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE PATIENT USUALLY MANAGES THEIR DIABETES NOR WHETHER THE PATIENT TOOK ANY ACTIONS BASED ON THE LOW READING RECEIVED ON THE SUBJECT METER. AT AN UNSPECIFIED TIME, THE PATIENT STARTED TO FEEL ¿DIZZY¿ AND WAS BROUGHT TO THE HOSPITAL FOR UNSPECIFIED TREATMENT. THE REPORTER INFORMED THE CCA THAT A LABORATORY TEST WAS DONE AT THE HOSPITAL AND A BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF ¿300 MG/DL¿ WAS OBTAINED. DURING TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CCA ESTABLISHED THAT THE TEST STRIPS HAD BEEN STORED PROPERLY, WERE NOT OPEN BEYOND THEIR DISCARD DATE AND HAD NOT EXPIRED. THE CCA REPLACED THE PRODUCTS. MEDICAL SURV

    Patient problems: Dizziness

    MAUDE report 16483144 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2023Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON (B)(6) 2023, THE REPORTER (A SALES REPRESENTATIVE) OF THE PATIENT/LAY USER CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) SPAIN ALLEGING THAT THE PATIENT¿S ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER READ INACCURATELY LOW COMPARED TO A LABORATORY TEST. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DURING THE INITIAL CALL, SINCE THE PATIENT WAS UNABLE TO BE REACHED BY PHONE FOR FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS. THE REPORTER DID NOT SPECIFY WHEN THE ALLEGED ISSUE STARTED. THE REPORTER STATED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED A LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF ¿20/30 MG/DL¿ ON THE SUBJECT METER. THE REPORTER DID NOT HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE PATIENT USUALLY MANAGES THEIR DIABETES NOR WHETHER THE PATIENT TOOK ANY ACTIONS BASED ON THE LOW READING RECEIVED ON THE SUBJECT METER. AT AN UNSPECIFIED TIME, THE PATIENT STARTED TO FEEL ¿DIZZY¿ AND WAS BROUGHT TO THE HOSPITAL FOR UNSPECIFIED TREATMENT. THE REPORTER INFORMED THE CCA THAT A LABORATORY TEST WAS DONE AT THE HOSPITAL AND A BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF ¿300 MG/DL¿ WAS OBTAINED. DURING TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CCA ESTABLISHED THAT THE TEST STRIPS HAD BEEN STORED PROPERLY, WERE NOT OPEN BEYOND THEIR DISCARD DATE AND HAD NOT EXPIRED. THE CCA REPLACED THE PRODUCTS. MEDICAL SURV

    Patient problems: Dizziness

    MAUDE report 16483138 ↗
  • InjuryMar 2, 2023Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON FEBRUARY 21, 2023, THE LAY USER/PATIENT¿S DAUGHTER CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS), ALLEGING THAT THE PATIENT¿S ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER WAS READING INACCURATELY HIGH. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DOCUMENTATION, SINCE THE REPORTER WAS UNWILLING TO PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION DURING A FOLLOW-UP CALL. THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT HAD RECENTLY STARTED RECEIVING WHAT SHE FELT WERE INACCURATE HIGH READINGS OF ¿OVER 300 MG/DL¿ WITH THE SUBJECT METER. THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT MANAGES HER DIABETES WITH ORAL MEDICATION (DIABETEX 500 MG, ONLY ONE TABLET A DAY BECAUSE SHE IS HIGHLY ALLERGIC). THE REPORTER ALSO MENTIONED THE PATIENT IS ON BETA BLOCKERS. THE REPORTER STATED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, BETWEEN 5:00 PM AND 6:00 PM, THE PATIENT BECAME SCARED WHEN SHE RECEIVED A READING OF ¿317 MG/DL¿ WITH THE SUBJECT METER AND TOOK ONE DIABETEX 500 MG TABLET IN RESPONSE. AS A RESULT, THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED HYPOGLYCEMIA WITH SYMPTOMS OF ¿ALMOST BECAME UNCONSCIOUS, DIZZY, POWERLESS AND PALE FACE¿ ON (B)(6) 2023, BETWEEN 5:00 PM AND 6:00 PM. THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT WAS IMMEDIATELY TAKEN TO HOSPITAL BY AMBULANCE AND WAS GIVEN ¿NITR

    Patient problems: Dizziness; Extreme Exhaustion; Hypoglycemia; Pallor; Presyncope

    MAUDE report 16475121 ↗
  • InjuryMar 2, 2023Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON FEBRUARY 21, 2023, THE LAY USER/PATIENT¿S DAUGHTER CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS), ALLEGING THAT THE PATIENT¿S ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER WAS READING INACCURATELY HIGH. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DOCUMENTATION. THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT HAD RECENTLY STARTED RECEIVING WHAT SHE FELT WERE INACCURATE HIGH READINGS OF ¿OVER 300 MG/DL¿ WITH THE SUBJECT METER. THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT MANAGES HER DIABETES WITH ORAL MEDICATION (DIABETEX 500 MG, ONLY ONE TABLET A DAY BECAUSE SHE IS HIGHLY ALLERGIC). THE REPORTER STATED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, BETWEEN 5:00 PM AND 6:00 PM, THE PATIENT BECAME SCARED WHEN SHE RECEIVED A READING OF ¿317 MG/DL¿ WITH THE SUBJECT METER AND TOOK ONE DIABETEX 500 MG TABLET IN RESPONSE. AS A RESULT, THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED HYPOGLYCEMIA WITH SYMPTOMS OF ¿ALMOST BECAME UNCONSCIOUS, DIZZY, POWERLESS AND PALE FACE¿ ON (B)(6) 2023, BETWEEN 5:00 PM AND 6:00 PM. THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT WAS IMMEDIATELY TAKEN TO HOSPITAL BY AMBULANCE AND WAS GIVEN ¿NITROSTROS¿ MEDICATION IN HER MOUTH ¿TO WAKE HER UP¿. THE REPORTER CLAIMED A BLOOD GLUCOSE TEST WAS PERFORMED ON A NEIGHBOR¿S METER PRIOR TO RECEIVING TRE

    Patient problems: Dizziness; Extreme Exhaustion; Hypoglycemia; Pallor; Presyncope

    MAUDE report 16475120 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2022Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON (B)(6) 2022, THE LAY USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) (B)(4), ALLEGING THAT HER ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER WAS READING INACCURATELY HIGH COMPARED TO HER FEELINGS AND/OR NORMAL READINGS. THIS COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DURING THE INITIAL CALL. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT CLAIMED OBTAINING BLOOD GLUCOSE READINGS OF ¿201 MG/DL¿ AT 4 AM AND ¿209 MG/DL¿ AT 5 AM WITH THE SUBJECT METER. THE PATIENT STATED THAT SHE MANAGES HER DIABETES WITH DIET AND EXERCISE AND TAKES NON-DIABETES RELATED MEDICATION (NOVATEC, TWICE A DAY). THE PATIENT DENIED THAT SHE MADE ANY CHANGES TO HER USUAL DIABETES MANAGEMENT REGIMEN IN RESPONSE TO THE ALLEGED ISSUE. ON THAT SAME MORNING, BETWEEN 4 AND 5 AM, THE PATIENT STARTED ¿SHAKING¿. THE PATIENT CLAIMED THAT SHE GOT SOME REST, TOOK ANOTHER BLOOD GLUCOSE TEST AT HER USUAL TIME 6:40 AM AND RECEIVED A RESULT OF ¿230 MG/DL¿ ON THE SUBJECT METER. THE PATIENT INFORMED THAT SHE ATE BREAKFAST (4 RUSKS WITH WHITE CHEESE) AND INDICATED THAT SHE FELT A BIT BETTER. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY MEDICAL TREATMENT/INTERVENTION RECEIVED AS A RESULT OF THE AL

    Patient problems: Shaking/Tremors

    MAUDE report 13745306 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2022Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON MARCH 9, 2022, THE LAY USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) FRANCE, ALLEGING THAT HER ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER WAS READING INACCURATELY HIGH COMPARED TO HER FEELINGS AND/OR NORMAL READINGS. THIS COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DURING THE INITIAL CALL. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN ON MARCH 9, 2022. THE PATIENT CLAIMED OBTAINING BLOOD GLUCOSE READINGS OF ¿201 MG/DL¿ AT 4 AM AND ¿209 MG/DL¿ AT 5 AM WITH THE SUBJECT METER. THE PATIENT STATED THAT SHE MANAGES HER DIABETES WITH DIET AND EXERCISE AND TAKES NON-DIABETES RELATED MEDICATION (NOVATEC, TWICE A DAY). THE PATIENT DENIED THAT SHE MADE ANY CHANGES TO HER USUAL DIABETES MANAGEMENT REGIMEN IN RESPONSE TO THE ALLEGED ISSUE. ON THAT SAME MORNING, BETWEEN 4 AND 5 AM, THE PATIENT STARTED ¿SHAKING¿. THE PATIENT CLAIMED THAT SHE GOT SOME REST, TOOK ANOTHER BLOOD GLUCOSE TEST AT HER USUAL TIME 6:40 AM AND RECEIVED A RESULT OF ¿230 MG/DL¿ ON THE SUBJECT METER. THE PATIENT INFORMED THAT SHE ATE BREAKFAST (4 RUSKS WITH WHITE CHEESE) AND INDICATED THAT SHE FELT A BIT BETTER. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY MEDICAL TREATMENT/INTERVENTION RECEIVED AS A RESULT OF TH

    Patient problems: Shaking/Tremors

    MAUDE report 13745173 ↗
  • InjuryJan 25, 2021Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON (B)(6) 2021, THE LAY-USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) (B)(4), ALLEGING THAT HIS ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER READ INACCURATELY HIGH COMPARED TO HIS FEELINGS AND/OR NORMAL READINGS. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DOCUMENTATION. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT THE ALLEGED METER INACCURACY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2021 AT 6:12 PM. THE PATIENT REPORTED OBTAINING AN INACCURATE HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF ¿122 MG/DL¿ WITH THE SUBJECT. THE PATIENT MANAGES HIS DIABETES WITH A FIXED DOSE OF INSULIN (10 UNITS DAILY AFTER EVENING MEAL). THE PATIENT DENIED MAKING ANY CHANGES TO HIS USUAL DIABETES MANAGEMENT REGIMEN AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT 15 MINUTES AFTER THE ALLEGED ISSUE OCCURRED , HE DEVELOPED SYMPTOMS OF ¿EYE PAIN LIKE A MIGRAINE, WEAK AND SHAKING;¿ SYMPTOMS HE ASSOCIATED WITH HYPOGLYCEMIA. THE PATIENT CLAIMED HE TREATED HIMSELF WITH SUGAR IN RESPONSE TO THE SYMPTOMS AND FELT BETTER A FEW MINUTES AFTERWARDS. THE PATIENT DENIED USING ANY OTHER DEVICE TO TEST HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CCA CONFIRMED THE UNIT OF MEASURE WAS SET CORRECTLY ON THE SUBJECT METER. THE CCA NOTED THE PATIENT DID NOT HA

    Patient problems: Fatigue; Headache; Hypoglycemia; Shaking/Tremors

    MAUDE report 11224176 ↗
  • InjuryJan 25, 2021Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON (B)(6) 2021, THE LAY-USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) (B)(4), ALLEGING THAT HIS ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER READ INACCURATELY HIGH COMPARED TO HIS FEELINGS AND/OR NORMAL READINGS. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE AGENT (CCA) DOCUMENTATION. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT THE ALLEGED METER INACCURACY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2021 AT 6:12 PM. THE PATIENT REPORTED OBTAINING AN INACCURATE HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF ¿122 MG/DL¿ WITH THE SUBJECT. THE PATIENT MANAGES HIS DIABETES WITH A FIXED DOSE OF INSULIN (10 UNITS DAILY AFTER EVENING MEAL). THE PATIENT DENIED MAKING ANY CHANGES TO HIS USUAL DIABETES MANAGEMENT REGIMEN AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT 15 MINUTES AFTER THE ALLEGED ISSUE OCCURRED , HE DEVELOPED SYMPTOMS OF ¿EYE PAIN LIKE A MIGRAINE, WEAK AND SHAKING;¿ SYMPTOMS HE ASSOCIATED WITH HYPOGLYCEMIA. THE PATIENT CLAIMED HE TREATED HIMSELF WITH SUGAR IN RESPONSE TO THE SYMPTOMS AND FELT BETTER A FEW MINUTES AFTERWARDS. THE PATIENT DENIED USING ANY OTHER DEVICE TO TEST HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CCA CONFIRMED THE UNIT OF MEASURE WAS SET CORRECTLY ON THE SUBJECT METER. THE CCA NOTED THE PATIENT DID NOT HA

    Patient problems: Fatigue; Headache; Hypoglycemia; Shaking/Tremors

    MAUDE report 11224147 ↗
  • InjuryNov 12, 2019Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON (B)(6) 2019, A REPORTER FOR THE PATIENT (THE PATIENT¿S WIFE) CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) (B)(4), ALLEGING THAT THE PATIENT¿S ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER DISPLAYED INACCURATELY HIGH RESULTS COMPARED TO THE PATIENT¿S FEELINGS/NORMAL RESULTS. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CSR) DOCUMENTATION. THE REPORTER CLAIMED THAT AT 8:05 PM ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT TESTED HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL USING THE SUBJECT METER AND OBTAINED A RESULT OF ¿474MG/DL¿; THE PATIENT CONSIDERED THIS RESULT HIGH COMPARED TO HIS USUAL PRE-EVENING MEAL RESULT OF ¿105 MG/DL¿ . THE PATIENT MANAGES HIS DIABETES WITH INSULIN WHICH HE SELF- ADJUSTS. THE REPORTER STATED THAT AFTER OBTAINING THE ¿HIGH¿ RESULT, THE PATIENT TESTED HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVELS AT 8:08 PM AND 8:13 PM, OBTAINING READINGS OF ¿463 MG/DL¿ AND ¿277 MG/DL¿, RESPECTIVELY. THE REPORTER INDICATED THAT AT 8:13 PM, THE PATIENT ADMINISTERED AN INCREASED INSULIN DOSE (EXACT BRAND/DOSE NOT KNOWN BY REPORTER). THE REPORTER STATED THAT SOMETIME AFTER ADMINISTERING THE INSULIN, THE PATIENT ¿FELT FAINT¿ WITH SYMPTOMS OF ¿TREMBLING AND SWEATING¿. SHE REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT SELF-TREATED HIS SYMPTOMS BY CONSUMING FOOD

    Patient problems: Shaking/Tremors; Sweating; Syncope

    MAUDE report 9309488 ↗
  • InjuryNov 12, 2019Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON (B)(6) 2019, A REPORTER FOR THE PATIENT (THE PATIENT¿S WIFE) CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) FRANCE, ALLEGING THAT THE PATIENT¿S ONETOUCH VERIO REFLECT METER DISPLAYED INACCURATELY HIGH RESULTS COMPARED TO THE PATIENT¿S FEELINGS/NORMAL RESULTS. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CSR) DOCUMENTATION. THE REPORTER CLAIMED THAT AT 8:05 PM ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT TESTED HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL USING THE SUBJECT METER AND OBTAINED A RESULT OF ¿474MG/DL¿; THE PATIENT CONSIDERED THIS RESULT HIGH COMPARED TO HIS USUAL PRE-EVENING MEAL RESULT OF ¿105 MG/DL¿ . THE PATIENT MANAGES HIS DIABETES WITH INSULIN WHICH HE SELF- ADJUSTS. THE REPORTER STATED THAT AFTER OBTAINING THE ¿HIGH¿ RESULT, THE PATIENT TESTED HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVELS AT 8:08 PM AND 8:13 PM, OBTAINING READINGS OF ¿463 MG/DL¿ AND ¿277 MG/DL¿, RESPECTIVELY. THE REPORTER INDICATED THAT AT 8:13 PM, THE PATIENT ADMINISTERED AN INCREASED INSULIN DOSE (EXACT BRAND/DOSE NOT KNOWN BY REPORTER). THE REPORTER STATED THAT SOMETIME AFTER ADMINISTERING THE INSULIN, THE PATIENT ¿FELT FAINT¿ WITH SYMPTOMS OF ¿TREMBLING AND SWEATING¿. SHE REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT SELF-TREATED HIS SYMPTOMS BY CONSUMING FOOD

    Patient problems: Shaking/Tremors; Sweating; Syncope

    MAUDE report 9309484 ↗

Other System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter devices

All System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page